Simulation software - multicriterial evaluation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F21%3A10248281" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/21:10248281 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.cssi-morava.cz/new/doc/IT2021/sbornik.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.cssi-morava.cz/new/doc/IT2021/sbornik.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Simulation software - multicriterial evaluation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Today, simulation tools are becoming a widely used part of management information support. Their use can give businesses and companies a competitive advantage. The paper suggests criteria for evaluation and their choosing and compares them for creating dynamic models using two selected methods of multi-criteria decision making. SW tools are compared in the evaluation using seven criteria, which were selected for modelling and simulation in different areas and are important for SME company employees. The aim of this paper is to compare the specific software available that supports the creation of simulation models using selected methods of multi-criteria evaluation. The Saaty method was used to determine the weight of the criteria and the AHP method and the TOPSIS method were used to evaluate the variants. The results of the application of both methods in the comparison of variants showed that the most suitable software tool for creating applications that facilitate decision-making is Vensim, the second and third positions were occupied by MATLAB and Witness. Rank 2 and 3rd positions differed in the application of the given methods.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Simulation software - multicriterial evaluation
Popis výsledku anglicky
Today, simulation tools are becoming a widely used part of management information support. Their use can give businesses and companies a competitive advantage. The paper suggests criteria for evaluation and their choosing and compares them for creating dynamic models using two selected methods of multi-criteria decision making. SW tools are compared in the evaluation using seven criteria, which were selected for modelling and simulation in different areas and are important for SME company employees. The aim of this paper is to compare the specific software available that supports the creation of simulation models using selected methods of multi-criteria evaluation. The Saaty method was used to determine the weight of the criteria and the AHP method and the TOPSIS method were used to evaluate the variants. The results of the application of both methods in the comparison of variants showed that the most suitable software tool for creating applications that facilitate decision-making is Vensim, the second and third positions were occupied by MATLAB and Witness. Rank 2 and 3rd positions differed in the application of the given methods.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Technology for Practice : IT for Practice 2021 : November 18-19, 2021, Ostrava, Czech Republic
ISBN
978-80-248-4562-3
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
43-52
Název nakladatele
VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava
Místo vydání
Ostrava
Místo konání akce
Ostrava
Datum konání akce
18. 11. 2021
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—