Similarity of TOPSIS results based on criterion variability: Case study on public economic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F22%3A10250550" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/22:10250550 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271951" target="_blank" >https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271951</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271951" target="_blank" >10.1371/journal.pone.0271951</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Similarity of TOPSIS results based on criterion variability: Case study on public economic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the real world, acceptance of a decision is conditional on the availability of a great volume of data. Selection of a suitable solution on the basis of this data represents a problem that multi-criterial methods (MCDM) are applied to. The issue of which of these should be favoured during their use involves a specification of the importance of the assessed criteria. The goal of the presented research is to quantify the differences (symmetry) in assessment using selected MCDM methods (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution-TOPSIS), while applying an absolute and relative variability of the assessed criteria to a determination of their importance. The obtained results indicate that the order of the assessed subject (alternative) is not directly influenced by the method of determining the variability of the assessed criteria. We can also state that the degree of concurrence in the order of application of the TOPSIS technique, in combination with both approaches expressed by the Jaccard index, is relatively low. (C) 2022 Vavrek, Bečica. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Similarity of TOPSIS results based on criterion variability: Case study on public economic

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the real world, acceptance of a decision is conditional on the availability of a great volume of data. Selection of a suitable solution on the basis of this data represents a problem that multi-criterial methods (MCDM) are applied to. The issue of which of these should be favoured during their use involves a specification of the importance of the assessed criteria. The goal of the presented research is to quantify the differences (symmetry) in assessment using selected MCDM methods (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution-TOPSIS), while applying an absolute and relative variability of the assessed criteria to a determination of their importance. The obtained results indicate that the order of the assessed subject (alternative) is not directly influenced by the method of determining the variability of the assessed criteria. We can also state that the degree of concurrence in the order of application of the TOPSIS technique, in combination with both approaches expressed by the Jaccard index, is relatively low. (C) 2022 Vavrek, Bečica. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

PLoS One

ISSN

1932-6203

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

8 August

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

nestrankovano

Kód UT WoS článku

000848077100060

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85135432718