Interpretive delirium and dromoscopic visibility order

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27620%2F16%3A86098928" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27620/16:86098928 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Interpretive delirium and dromoscopic visibility order

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Since the Renaissance period, science considered experience as the most important prerequisite of studying reality. However, that has changed. If there was thinking experience at the beginning of the experimental sciences, then today we are witnessing the decline of this mental and analogous procedures. The effect of the speed on reality depends both on our perception of what is usually called reality, and on our talking about this thing called reality. The creators of dromosphere are light, speed and vision: where there is no light, there is no vision. The French philosopher Paul Virilio thinks that there has been a massive challenge to the validity post-Renaissance ways of narration of reality, including the validity of the criteria by which we divide things in real and unreal. So, even science succumbed to dromospheric order of vision and replaced the experience with reality with its various representations, often of unscientific origin. Interpretive delirium and dromoscopic order of visibility together with the associated dromospheric perception arose by relatively rapid inversion of locations and functions of geometrical optics and wave optics: direct vision (eye) made way for indirect vision (computer), the subject of vision (tree) made way to its character representation (photo of a tree). The result is a victory of the new logistics of perception, new dromoscopy. Indirect inner light of screens is our second sun. The text analyses Virilio's proposition that technical apparatus came into play employing active wave optics and the speed of indirect light, which contributed to the emergence dromoscopic order of vision, which completely transformed the existing logistics of perception of reality.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Interpretive delirium and dromoscopic visibility order

Popis výsledku anglicky

Since the Renaissance period, science considered experience as the most important prerequisite of studying reality. However, that has changed. If there was thinking experience at the beginning of the experimental sciences, then today we are witnessing the decline of this mental and analogous procedures. The effect of the speed on reality depends both on our perception of what is usually called reality, and on our talking about this thing called reality. The creators of dromosphere are light, speed and vision: where there is no light, there is no vision. The French philosopher Paul Virilio thinks that there has been a massive challenge to the validity post-Renaissance ways of narration of reality, including the validity of the criteria by which we divide things in real and unreal. So, even science succumbed to dromospheric order of vision and replaced the experience with reality with its various representations, often of unscientific origin. Interpretive delirium and dromoscopic order of visibility together with the associated dromospheric perception arose by relatively rapid inversion of locations and functions of geometrical optics and wave optics: direct vision (eye) made way for indirect vision (computer), the subject of vision (tree) made way to its character representation (photo of a tree). The result is a victory of the new logistics of perception, new dromoscopy. Indirect inner light of screens is our second sun. The text analyses Virilio's proposition that technical apparatus came into play employing active wave optics and the speed of indirect light, which contributed to the emergence dromoscopic order of vision, which completely transformed the existing logistics of perception of reality.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

AEON International Multidisciplinary Conference on Social Sciences and Arts : proceedings : September 30 - October 2, 2016, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

ISBN

978-619-90803-0-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

46-50

Název nakladatele

Aeon Eood

Místo vydání

Plovdiv

Místo konání akce

Plovdiv

Datum konání akce

30. 9. 2016

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—