Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F09%3A00009627" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/09:00009627 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Introduction: The benefits conffered by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are markedly influenced by the left ventricular (LV) lead placement. Little is known regarding the optimal right ventricular (RV) stimulation site. Study Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of CRT in patients with RV leads placed in the mid-septal region versus the apex. Methods and Results: This nonrandomized, observational study included 117 patients with standard indications for CRT. The LV lead was implanted onthe postero-lateral or lateral LV wall, while the RV lead was implanted at the apex (n = 82) or in the mid-septum (n = 35). Both groups were similar with respect to baseline clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic characteristics. After 12 months ofCRT, the rates of clinical response to CRT were similar in both groups (63% vs. 66%), and similar degrees of reverse LV remodelling and LV resynchronization were observed on echocardiography and color tissue Doppler imaging. A >= 30% rel
Název v anglickém jazyce
Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems
Popis výsledku anglicky
Introduction: The benefits conffered by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are markedly influenced by the left ventricular (LV) lead placement. Little is known regarding the optimal right ventricular (RV) stimulation site. Study Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of CRT in patients with RV leads placed in the mid-septal region versus the apex. Methods and Results: This nonrandomized, observational study included 117 patients with standard indications for CRT. The LV lead was implanted onthe postero-lateral or lateral LV wall, while the RV lead was implanted at the apex (n = 82) or in the mid-septum (n = 35). Both groups were similar with respect to baseline clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic characteristics. After 12 months ofCRT, the rates of clinical response to CRT were similar in both groups (63% vs. 66%), and similar degrees of reverse LV remodelling and LV resynchronization were observed on echocardiography and color tissue Doppler imaging. A >= 30% rel
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2009
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Pacing Clinical Electrophysiology
ISSN
0147-8389
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
32
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
S 1
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—