Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F11%3A10223275" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/11:10223275 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2011.044" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2011.044</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2011.044" target="_blank" >10.5507/bp.2011.044</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

EUS performed prior to ERCP or surgery in patients with a low to moderate probability of choledocholithiasis. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and TUS compared to ERCP in a cohort of 100 patients. The sensitivity andaccuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of common bile duct dilatation were 84% and 83%, i.e. significantly higher (p=0.0001) than TUS (46% and 66%, ). The specificities (82%, 91%) were not significantly different (p=0.218). The sensitivity and accuracy of EUSin the diagnosis of pathological content of the common bile duct were 88% and 92%, i.e. significantly higher (p{0.0001) than TUS (33% and 64%). The specificities (96%, 94%) were not significantly different (p=0.641). The incidence of choledocholithiasisin the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the moderate-risk group (p=0.012). EUS is a method with high sensitivity, specificity. It should therefore be preferred to ERCP in patients with low or moderate risk of choledocholit

Název v anglickém jazyce

Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction

Popis výsledku anglicky

EUS performed prior to ERCP or surgery in patients with a low to moderate probability of choledocholithiasis. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and TUS compared to ERCP in a cohort of 100 patients. The sensitivity andaccuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of common bile duct dilatation were 84% and 83%, i.e. significantly higher (p=0.0001) than TUS (46% and 66%, ). The specificities (82%, 91%) were not significantly different (p=0.218). The sensitivity and accuracy of EUSin the diagnosis of pathological content of the common bile duct were 88% and 92%, i.e. significantly higher (p{0.0001) than TUS (33% and 64%). The specificities (96%, 94%) were not significantly different (p=0.641). The incidence of choledocholithiasisin the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the moderate-risk group (p=0.012). EUS is a method with high sensitivity, specificity. It should therefore be preferred to ERCP in patients with low or moderate risk of choledocholit

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FE - Ostatní obory vnitřního lékařství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT11023" target="_blank" >NT11023: PET/CT a ultrastrukturální změny mitochondrií jako prediktivní faktory u karcinomu pankreatu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biomedical Papers-Olomouc

ISSN

1213-8118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

155

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

225-232

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—