Validation of a New Panel of Automated Chemiluminescence Assays for Anticardiolipin Antibodies in the Screening for Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F16%3A33159427" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/16:33159427 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.151129" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.151129</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.151129" target="_blank" >10.7754/Clin.Lab.2015.151129</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Validation of a New Panel of Automated Chemiluminescence Assays for Anticardiolipin Antibodies in the Screening for Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: Antibodies Anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) are two of three laboratory criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). All of assays of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), coagulation as- says as well as ELISAs, show methodological shortcomings, that affect their sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, we decided to validate these parameters for a new chemiluminescent examination (CLIA). Methods: aCL and aβ2GPI antibodies were measured by ELISAs (AIDA, Bad Kruznach, Germany) and aβ2GPI with CLIA kits (Werfen, Barcelona, Spain). Results: When we evaluated both assays, the coefficient of variation for CLIA was slightly lower (9.04 - 12.74%) than for ELISA (11.05 - 15.3%) and the LOD was 0.2 IU/L. The dilution series showed significant linearity for all CLIA methods, aCL IgG, aCL IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, and aβ2GPI IgM (0 - 3000 IU/L), and method comparison stud- ies revealed good agreement with the currently used ELISA (Kappa values ranging 0.534 - 0.936) without deter- mination of aβ2GPI IgG. The determination aβ2GPI IgG by CLIA method shows higher positivity in 31 samples. These new aCL IgG, aCL IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, and aβ2GPI IgM tests have excellent analytical characteristics and allow fully automated and simultaneous analysis on an analyzer. Conclusions: Chemiluminescent determination of an automated analyzer can improve the fundamental parame- ters of tests such as reproducibility between laboratories.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Validation of a New Panel of Automated Chemiluminescence Assays for Anticardiolipin Antibodies in the Screening for Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: Antibodies Anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) are two of three laboratory criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). All of assays of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), coagulation as- says as well as ELISAs, show methodological shortcomings, that affect their sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, we decided to validate these parameters for a new chemiluminescent examination (CLIA). Methods: aCL and aβ2GPI antibodies were measured by ELISAs (AIDA, Bad Kruznach, Germany) and aβ2GPI with CLIA kits (Werfen, Barcelona, Spain). Results: When we evaluated both assays, the coefficient of variation for CLIA was slightly lower (9.04 - 12.74%) than for ELISA (11.05 - 15.3%) and the LOD was 0.2 IU/L. The dilution series showed significant linearity for all CLIA methods, aCL IgG, aCL IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, and aβ2GPI IgM (0 - 3000 IU/L), and method comparison stud- ies revealed good agreement with the currently used ELISA (Kappa values ranging 0.534 - 0.936) without deter- mination of aβ2GPI IgG. The determination aβ2GPI IgG by CLIA method shows higher positivity in 31 samples. These new aCL IgG, aCL IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, and aβ2GPI IgM tests have excellent analytical characteristics and allow fully automated and simultaneous analysis on an analyzer. Conclusions: Chemiluminescent determination of an automated analyzer can improve the fundamental parame- ters of tests such as reproducibility between laboratories.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FD - Onkologie a hematologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Clinical Laboratory
ISSN
1433-6510
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
62
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1309-1315
Kód UT WoS článku
000385813300016
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—