Reliability comparison of two forensic dental age estimation methods
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F16%3A33161821" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/16:33161821 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol15-issue2/Version-7/J015276063.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol15-issue2/Version-7/J015276063.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/0853-15276063" target="_blank" >10.9790/0853-15276063</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Reliability comparison of two forensic dental age estimation methods
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Aim: Our aim was to compare reliability of Gustafson's and Johanson's method of forensic age estimation in extracted thirds molars. Material and Method: 42 ground sections of third molars were evaluated according to Gustafson' s and Johanson's method. Patient's age and gender was registered at time of extraction of third molar. We evaluated level of attrition, secondary dentine deposition in pulp, changes in periodontium, cementum apposition, and root resorption and root translucency. Each factor was alloted a score regarding degree of changes in the tooth. Total score was calculated and transferred to the estimated age according to Gustafson's and Johanson's formula. A mean difference of 5.38 and 4.97 years was obtained with Gustafson's formula and Johanson's formula, respectively. Conclusion: Despite of the variability of third molars, we found a significant correlation between estimated dental age and chronological age of an individual. Johanson's method proved to be more reliable than Gustafson's method.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Reliability comparison of two forensic dental age estimation methods
Popis výsledku anglicky
Aim: Our aim was to compare reliability of Gustafson's and Johanson's method of forensic age estimation in extracted thirds molars. Material and Method: 42 ground sections of third molars were evaluated according to Gustafson' s and Johanson's method. Patient's age and gender was registered at time of extraction of third molar. We evaluated level of attrition, secondary dentine deposition in pulp, changes in periodontium, cementum apposition, and root resorption and root translucency. Each factor was alloted a score regarding degree of changes in the tooth. Total score was calculated and transferred to the estimated age according to Gustafson's and Johanson's formula. A mean difference of 5.38 and 4.97 years was obtained with Gustafson's formula and Johanson's formula, respectively. Conclusion: Despite of the variability of third molars, we found a significant correlation between estimated dental age and chronological age of an individual. Johanson's method proved to be more reliable than Gustafson's method.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FF - ORL, oftalmologie, stomatologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences
ISSN
2279-0861
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
IN - Indická republika
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
60-63
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—