Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

F*ck your care if you label me! Borderline personality disorder, stigma, and self-stigma

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F17%3A73589112" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/17:73589112 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.rediviva.sav.sk/59i1/16.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.rediviva.sav.sk/59i1/16.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    F*ck your care if you label me! Borderline personality disorder, stigma, and self-stigma

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    INTRODUCTION: According to recent results, a significant number of psychiatrists, psychologists, psychotherapists, and general public show negative and stigmatizing attitudes towards patients with toward borderline personality disorder (BPD). Such attitudes may manifest in negative thoughts and harmful or discriminating behavior towards people with this disorder. METHOD: Studies were identified through the Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus databases, including resources within the period 1990-2014. Additional references were found using reviews of relevant articles. The search terms included &quot;borderline&quot;, &quot;stigma&quot;, &quot;self-stigma&quot;, &quot;therapy&quot;, &quot;treatment&quot;, &quot;psychotherapy&quot;, and &quot;psychosocial treatment&quot;. RESULTS: The stigmatizing beliefs of the professionals and the general public are common in the case of the patients with BPD. Health care professionals tend to be more prone to stigmatize the individuals with BPD than lay population. People with BPD come across serious difficulties, such as unstable emotionality, impulsivity, low threshold of frustration, and following issues in social and occupational functioning. These problems are inevitably present the patients&apos; contact with the health care professionals. Insufficient supervision of the therapeutic process and lack of sufficient competence in the work with the patients with BPD can lead to the clinicians&apos; stigmatizing attitudes and behavior. In these cases, the health care professionals often use derogatory expressions to describe persons with BPD, such as &quot;treatment resistant&quot;, &quot;complicated&quot;, &quot;demanding&quot;, &quot;dangerous&quot;, &quot;manipulative&quot;, and &quot;attention seeking&quot;. Negative attitudes among psychiatrists, other physicians, nurses, psychotherapists, and health care administrators support the marginalization of BPD within the systems of mental health care. CONCLUSION: Substantial development in the empirical and practical knowledge of the patients suffering from BPD challenges the stereotypical labels of the individuals with this disorder. Continual supervision may offer a solution in the case to case scenario of the stigmatizing professionals. The fundamental questioning of the marginalized status of patients with BPD is also required.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    F*ck your care if you label me! Borderline personality disorder, stigma, and self-stigma

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    INTRODUCTION: According to recent results, a significant number of psychiatrists, psychologists, psychotherapists, and general public show negative and stigmatizing attitudes towards patients with toward borderline personality disorder (BPD). Such attitudes may manifest in negative thoughts and harmful or discriminating behavior towards people with this disorder. METHOD: Studies were identified through the Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus databases, including resources within the period 1990-2014. Additional references were found using reviews of relevant articles. The search terms included &quot;borderline&quot;, &quot;stigma&quot;, &quot;self-stigma&quot;, &quot;therapy&quot;, &quot;treatment&quot;, &quot;psychotherapy&quot;, and &quot;psychosocial treatment&quot;. RESULTS: The stigmatizing beliefs of the professionals and the general public are common in the case of the patients with BPD. Health care professionals tend to be more prone to stigmatize the individuals with BPD than lay population. People with BPD come across serious difficulties, such as unstable emotionality, impulsivity, low threshold of frustration, and following issues in social and occupational functioning. These problems are inevitably present the patients&apos; contact with the health care professionals. Insufficient supervision of the therapeutic process and lack of sufficient competence in the work with the patients with BPD can lead to the clinicians&apos; stigmatizing attitudes and behavior. In these cases, the health care professionals often use derogatory expressions to describe persons with BPD, such as &quot;treatment resistant&quot;, &quot;complicated&quot;, &quot;demanding&quot;, &quot;dangerous&quot;, &quot;manipulative&quot;, and &quot;attention seeking&quot;. Negative attitudes among psychiatrists, other physicians, nurses, psychotherapists, and health care administrators support the marginalization of BPD within the systems of mental health care. CONCLUSION: Substantial development in the empirical and practical knowledge of the patients suffering from BPD challenges the stereotypical labels of the individuals with this disorder. Continual supervision may offer a solution in the case to case scenario of the stigmatizing professionals. The fundamental questioning of the marginalized status of patients with BPD is also required.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30215 - Psychiatry

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Activitas Nervosa Superior Rediviva

  • ISSN

    1337-933X

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    59

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    SK - Slovenská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    16-22

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000404682800003

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85020428161