Comparison of analgesic use during iatrogenic pneumothorax treatment using an ambulatory device and a chest tube – a pilot study

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F19%3A73598853" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/19:73598853 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333178739" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333178739</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of analgesic use during iatrogenic pneumothorax treatment using an ambulatory device and a chest tube – a pilot study

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Pneumothorax is a common condition usually requiring invasive treatment. Nowadays, Heimlich valves and pneumothorax devices are available on the market. They offer full mobility and a higher level of comfort. It is however not yet known whether this approach is less painful in comparison with a classical chest tube with patients subsequently requiring lower doses of analgesia. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the Pleural Vent™ device and large-bore chest drainage (16/18F) in terms of the amount of analgesia used during the treatment of iatrogenic pneumothorax. Methods: This is a prospective non-randomized trial to which, 36 subjects (30 males) with iatrogenic pneumothorax were enrolled. 18 subjects were treated with Pleural Vent™ and 18 by chest tube insertion. The target level of analgesia was set at &lt;3 on the VAS (Visual Analog Scale; 0-10). The total amount of analgesia administered was calculated and the data statistically evaluated. Results: The groups did not differ significantly with regards to gender, age, body weight and pneumothorax aetiology. A statistically significant difference was found between the Defined Daily Doses of analgesics needed to obtain the required level of analgesia (p=0.037). Conclusions: This pilot study found that patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax treated with the Pleural Vent™ system required less analgesia in comparison with a chest tube. In accordance with a power analysis performed, more patients are currently being enrolled for future statistical evaluations.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of analgesic use during iatrogenic pneumothorax treatment using an ambulatory device and a chest tube – a pilot study

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Pneumothorax is a common condition usually requiring invasive treatment. Nowadays, Heimlich valves and pneumothorax devices are available on the market. They offer full mobility and a higher level of comfort. It is however not yet known whether this approach is less painful in comparison with a classical chest tube with patients subsequently requiring lower doses of analgesia. The aim of this pilot study was to compare the Pleural Vent™ device and large-bore chest drainage (16/18F) in terms of the amount of analgesia used during the treatment of iatrogenic pneumothorax. Methods: This is a prospective non-randomized trial to which, 36 subjects (30 males) with iatrogenic pneumothorax were enrolled. 18 subjects were treated with Pleural Vent™ and 18 by chest tube insertion. The target level of analgesia was set at &lt;3 on the VAS (Visual Analog Scale; 0-10). The total amount of analgesia administered was calculated and the data statistically evaluated. Results: The groups did not differ significantly with regards to gender, age, body weight and pneumothorax aetiology. A statistically significant difference was found between the Defined Daily Doses of analgesics needed to obtain the required level of analgesia (p=0.037). Conclusions: This pilot study found that patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax treated with the Pleural Vent™ system required less analgesia in comparison with a chest tube. In accordance with a power analysis performed, more patients are currently being enrolled for future statistical evaluations.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30203 - Respiratory systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Pneumologica et Phthiseologica

ISSN

1213-810X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

79

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

234-238

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

999