Validity of Simplified self-report methods versus standard use method for pain assessment in preschool-aged children

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15120%2F23%3A73619418" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15120/23:73619418 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jspn.12411" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jspn.12411</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12411" target="_blank" >10.1111/jspn.12411</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Validity of Simplified self-report methods versus standard use method for pain assessment in preschool-aged children

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Purpose: Children experience painful invasive procedures very intensely. The aim of health professionals is to help children minimize this traumatic experience. The S-FPS and S-COS tools offer children the possibility of self-assessing their pain. This can then be the basis for tailoring pain relief to the child’s individual need. The aim of this study is to present the validation procedure of the S-FPC, S-COS methods. Design and Methods: 135 children aged 3-6 years assessed their pain using the self-reported S-FPS and S-COS methods at three consecutive times, and their results were compared with the commonly used FLACC assessment scale. Intra-class correlations (ICC) were used to assess inter-rater agreement. Convergent validity was verified using Spearman&apos;s correlation coefficient. Results: This study demonstrated good validity for both the S FPS and S-COS assessment tools. The ICC coefficient showed good inter-rater correlation. Spearman&apos;s correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between the scales. Practice Implications: It is not possible to clearly select a best method of pain assessment in preschool children. To choose the most appropriate method, it is necessary to take into account the child&apos;s cognitive development and preferences.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Validity of Simplified self-report methods versus standard use method for pain assessment in preschool-aged children

Popis výsledku anglicky

Purpose: Children experience painful invasive procedures very intensely. The aim of health professionals is to help children minimize this traumatic experience. The S-FPS and S-COS tools offer children the possibility of self-assessing their pain. This can then be the basis for tailoring pain relief to the child’s individual need. The aim of this study is to present the validation procedure of the S-FPC, S-COS methods. Design and Methods: 135 children aged 3-6 years assessed their pain using the self-reported S-FPS and S-COS methods at three consecutive times, and their results were compared with the commonly used FLACC assessment scale. Intra-class correlations (ICC) were used to assess inter-rater agreement. Convergent validity was verified using Spearman&apos;s correlation coefficient. Results: This study demonstrated good validity for both the S FPS and S-COS assessment tools. The ICC coefficient showed good inter-rater correlation. Spearman&apos;s correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between the scales. Practice Implications: It is not possible to clearly select a best method of pain assessment in preschool children. To choose the most appropriate method, it is necessary to take into account the child&apos;s cognitive development and preferences.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30307 - Nursing

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing

ISSN

1539-0136

e-ISSN

1744-6155

Svazek periodika

28

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

"e12411"

Kód UT WoS článku

000999541100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85161446635