Nursing students’ perception of the clinical learning environment during the Covid-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15120%2F23%3A73619736" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15120/23:73619736 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://cejnm.osu.cz/cz/artkey/cjn-202303-0003_nursing-students-8217-perception-of-the-clinical-learning-environment-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-a-longitu.php" target="_blank" >https://cejnm.osu.cz/cz/artkey/cjn-202303-0003_nursing-students-8217-perception-of-the-clinical-learning-environment-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-a-longitu.php</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2023.14.0006" target="_blank" >10.15452/CEJNM.2023.14.0006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Nursing students’ perception of the clinical learning environment during the Covid-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objective: The study aimed to describe how undergraduate nursing students evaluated the clinical learning environment of their studies during the Covid-19 pandemic.Design: Longitudinal cohort study.Methods: The research sample of 49 full-time students who completed their first year clinical practice in the academic year of 2018/2019 was followed over three years of study. The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T) was used for data callection. Quantitative data were evaluated using descriptive and inductive statistics.Results: Overall, students evaluated the clinical environment throughout their studies as average. Interaction with a tutor received the lowest rating, while relationship with mentor and external factors of the clinical environment (nursing management and nursing care in the workplace) received the highest rating. Second-year students rated the practice environment most highly. Students were satisfied with individual supervision in the first two years. However, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, group supervision prevailed in the third year, resulting in reduced student satisfaction.Conclusions: Students’ perception of the clinical learning environment changed during their studies. These changes were driven by the quality of certain academic and clinical factors. The Covid-19 pandemic represented a significant impingement on the course and organization of clinical practice.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Nursing students’ perception of the clinical learning environment during the Covid-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objective: The study aimed to describe how undergraduate nursing students evaluated the clinical learning environment of their studies during the Covid-19 pandemic.Design: Longitudinal cohort study.Methods: The research sample of 49 full-time students who completed their first year clinical practice in the academic year of 2018/2019 was followed over three years of study. The Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T) was used for data callection. Quantitative data were evaluated using descriptive and inductive statistics.Results: Overall, students evaluated the clinical environment throughout their studies as average. Interaction with a tutor received the lowest rating, while relationship with mentor and external factors of the clinical environment (nursing management and nursing care in the workplace) received the highest rating. Second-year students rated the practice environment most highly. Students were satisfied with individual supervision in the first two years. However, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, group supervision prevailed in the third year, resulting in reduced student satisfaction.Conclusions: Students’ perception of the clinical learning environment changed during their studies. These changes were driven by the quality of certain academic and clinical factors. The Covid-19 pandemic represented a significant impingement on the course and organization of clinical practice.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30307 - Nursing
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
ISSN
2336-3517
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
915-923
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85175726639