Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15120%2F25%3A73630779" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15120/25:73630779 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17812" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17812</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17812" target="_blank" >10.1111/jocn.17812</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: Patient safety in undergraduate nursing studies is an indispensable component of the curriculum. The process ofexperiential learning from practice is of high value not only in terms of personal development but also enables students to identifyand address critical areas of patient safety that require improvement.Aim: To explore Czech undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture during clinical practice through amixed-method sequential study.Methods: Data were collected between 2021 and 2024 using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase utilised the hos-pital survey on patient safety culture for nursing students. Four hundred and eighty-two undergraduate nursing students from16 faculties across the Czech Republic participated. The subsequent qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews with12 undergraduate nursing students from one faculty in the Czech Republic. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods wereused to analyse quantitative results, complemented by a reflective thematic analysis of qualitative data.Results: The most negatively rated survey dimensions were ‘Frequency of events reported’ (37.0%) and ‘Nonpunitive responsesto errors’ (42.4%). Predictors for reporting adverse events in clinical practice were ‘Indicators of good practice’ (p ≤ 0.05). Basedon the quantitative phase, the interpretive journey of nursing students' experiences from Exposure to adverse events, throughFeeling disconnected and Cognitive dissonance, to the necessity of Speaking up for patient safety culture was captured in thequalitative phase.Conclusions: Nursing students struggle to engage in a patient safety culture, particularly in reporting adverse events duringclinical practice. Strengthening education on reporting and standards is essential for students, along with professional develop-ment for clinical staff to align practices and cultures.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: Patient safety in undergraduate nursing studies is an indispensable component of the curriculum. The process ofexperiential learning from practice is of high value not only in terms of personal development but also enables students to identifyand address critical areas of patient safety that require improvement.Aim: To explore Czech undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture during clinical practice through amixed-method sequential study.Methods: Data were collected between 2021 and 2024 using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase utilised the hos-pital survey on patient safety culture for nursing students. Four hundred and eighty-two undergraduate nursing students from16 faculties across the Czech Republic participated. The subsequent qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews with12 undergraduate nursing students from one faculty in the Czech Republic. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods wereused to analyse quantitative results, complemented by a reflective thematic analysis of qualitative data.Results: The most negatively rated survey dimensions were ‘Frequency of events reported’ (37.0%) and ‘Nonpunitive responsesto errors’ (42.4%). Predictors for reporting adverse events in clinical practice were ‘Indicators of good practice’ (p ≤ 0.05). Basedon the quantitative phase, the interpretive journey of nursing students' experiences from Exposure to adverse events, throughFeeling disconnected and Cognitive dissonance, to the necessity of Speaking up for patient safety culture was captured in thequalitative phase.Conclusions: Nursing students struggle to engage in a patient safety culture, particularly in reporting adverse events duringclinical practice. Strengthening education on reporting and standards is essential for students, along with professional develop-ment for clinical staff to align practices and cultures.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30307 - Nursing
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
ISSN
0962-1067
e-ISSN
1365-2702
Svazek periodika
34
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
7
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
2702-2717
Kód UT WoS článku
001483204200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105004347642