Johannes Jessenius, Between Plagiarism and an Adequate Understanding of Patrizi's Philosophy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F14%3A33151699" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/14:33151699 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Johannes Jessenius, Between Plagiarism and an Adequate Understanding of Patrizi's Philosophy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Scholars dealing with Jessenius' attitude towards Patrizi's thoughts differ radically in their assessment of Jessenius' intentions: Jessenius' approach has been considered to be badly done plagiarism, a purely opportunistic act, an honest but not long-lasting fascination with Patrizi's Platonism, or a correct understanding of Patrizi's grasp of his own philosophy. The reason for the dissimilarities could be said to be the interpretation of the form of Jessenius' reception of Francesco Patrizi's philosophy is usually only based on an analysis of his book Zoroaster, nova, brevis veraque de universo philosophia (Wittenberg 1593) and on the reference to the particular historical context of its publication. This paper tries to present a different view of Jessenius' edition of Zoroaster and his treatment of Patrizi's philosophy. The interpretation builds on an analysis not only of Zoroaster, but of his other philosophical works as well. It seems that Jessenius adopted the idea of the concord

Název v anglickém jazyce

Johannes Jessenius, Between Plagiarism and an Adequate Understanding of Patrizi's Philosophy

Popis výsledku anglicky

Scholars dealing with Jessenius' attitude towards Patrizi's thoughts differ radically in their assessment of Jessenius' intentions: Jessenius' approach has been considered to be badly done plagiarism, a purely opportunistic act, an honest but not long-lasting fascination with Patrizi's Platonism, or a correct understanding of Patrizi's grasp of his own philosophy. The reason for the dissimilarities could be said to be the interpretation of the form of Jessenius' reception of Francesco Patrizi's philosophy is usually only based on an analysis of his book Zoroaster, nova, brevis veraque de universo philosophia (Wittenberg 1593) and on the reference to the particular historical context of its publication. This paper tries to present a different view of Jessenius' edition of Zoroaster and his treatment of Patrizi's philosophy. The interpretation builds on an analysis not only of Zoroaster, but of his other philosophical works as well. It seems that Jessenius adopted the idea of the concord

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GB14-37038G" target="_blank" >GB14-37038G: Mezi renesancí a barokem: Filosofie a vědění v českých zemích a jejich širší evropský kontext</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Francesco Patrizi: Philosopher of the Renaissance

ISBN

978-80-244-4428-4

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

359-369

Název nakladatele

Univerzita Palackého

Místo vydání

Olomouc

Místo konání akce

Olomouc

Datum konání akce

24. 4. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—