Ideology and neuroscience: A very apt connexion?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F19%3A73601094" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/19:73601094 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.flepublications.com/ijisss/IJISSS-2019-Vol-51" target="_blank" >http://www.flepublications.com/ijisss/IJISSS-2019-Vol-51</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Ideology and neuroscience: A very apt connexion?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The term &quot;ideology&quot; has experienced a significant upheaval in understanding since its initial theoretical manifestation. Dating back to the 18th century, ideology had been part of science. Subsequently, however, ideology has become a societal bête noire, due to Napoleon Bonaparte’s pejorative conception of it. Notwithstanding the optimistic assumptions proposing the end of ideology in the 1990s, this paper argues that the crucial distinction between two basic ideological groups of liberals and conservatives represents a germane key concept even nowadays. In order to supply evidence, three related analytical approaches are introduced. The application of neuroscientific methods has proved that the brains of conservatives differ from liberals considerably. Nevertheless, the theme shall not be seen merely from a political perspective, because the findings may be consequently utilised within other fields, too. In this area, the neuroethical question exemplifies the complexity of neuropolitics as a whole.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ideology and neuroscience: A very apt connexion?

Popis výsledku anglicky

The term &quot;ideology&quot; has experienced a significant upheaval in understanding since its initial theoretical manifestation. Dating back to the 18th century, ideology had been part of science. Subsequently, however, ideology has become a societal bête noire, due to Napoleon Bonaparte’s pejorative conception of it. Notwithstanding the optimistic assumptions proposing the end of ideology in the 1990s, this paper argues that the crucial distinction between two basic ideological groups of liberals and conservatives represents a germane key concept even nowadays. In order to supply evidence, three related analytical approaches are introduced. The application of neuroscientific methods has proved that the brains of conservatives differ from liberals considerably. Nevertheless, the theme shall not be seen merely from a political perspective, because the findings may be consequently utilised within other fields, too. In this area, the neuroethical question exemplifies the complexity of neuropolitics as a whole.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science Studies

ISSN

2397-6934

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

5

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

5-13

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—