Governance Along The New Silk Road In Southeast Asia and Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of ASEAN, The EU and 17+1

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73600869" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73600869 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://ejournals.ukm.my/jebat/article/view/39015" target="_blank" >http://ejournals.ukm.my/jebat/article/view/39015</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Governance Along The New Silk Road In Southeast Asia and Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of ASEAN, The EU and 17+1

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Southeast Asia and Europe are key regions for the implementation of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). A comparison of China’s attempt to promote the BRI in both regions reveals that China acts both as a norm-setter and norm-taker. Both the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the European Union which established distinct regional governance systems perceive China’s growing ability to set norms in their region as a strategic threat. However, the 17+1 (formerly 16+1) cooperation format, established by China in Central and Eastern Europe as an umbrella for its bilateral relations, is embedded in the EU’s governance system. In Southeast Asia, China cooperates with the individual governments on a bilateral base, but also utilizes the existing ASEAN infrastructure schemes. The article argues that China needs to be better included in the established international and regional governance mechanisms. It concludes that after mutual compromises of the participants and reforms the New Silk Road could function as a respected framework for multilateral collaboration that complements, but does not replace the existing governance structures and principles.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Governance Along The New Silk Road In Southeast Asia and Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of ASEAN, The EU and 17+1

Popis výsledku anglicky

Southeast Asia and Europe are key regions for the implementation of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). A comparison of China’s attempt to promote the BRI in both regions reveals that China acts both as a norm-setter and norm-taker. Both the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the European Union which established distinct regional governance systems perceive China’s growing ability to set norms in their region as a strategic threat. However, the 17+1 (formerly 16+1) cooperation format, established by China in Central and Eastern Europe as an umbrella for its bilateral relations, is embedded in the EU’s governance system. In Southeast Asia, China cooperates with the individual governments on a bilateral base, but also utilizes the existing ASEAN infrastructure schemes. The article argues that China needs to be better included in the established international and regional governance mechanisms. It concludes that after mutual compromises of the participants and reforms the New Silk Road could function as a respected framework for multilateral collaboration that complements, but does not replace the existing governance structures and principles.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50601 - Political science

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Jebat-Malaysian Journal of History Politics and Strategic Studies

ISSN

0126-5644

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

47

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

MY - Malajsie

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

121-149

Kód UT WoS článku

000526101500006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—