Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16 1 platform’
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73601337" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73601337 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16 1 platform’
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
China and the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries have been engaged recently in dynamic diplomatic exchanges under the umbrella of 16+1 platform and the Belt and Road Initiative. The article offers an explanation of why the massive Chinese diplomatic effort did not lead to an improved image of China in the CEE region. We adopt the approach of cultural sociology and focus on how the two sides’ ‘meaning structures’ relate to each other. It is argued that main China’s discourse frame of ‘traditional friendship’ based on the shared socialist past is not well received in most of the CEE region which has quite problematic view of Communism due to own historic experience. The dissonance between the Chinese friendly rhetoric and the CEE lukewarm reception imply some deep-cutting differences when it comes to views of history which have significant political implications for current and future relations between the two sides.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Friends or foes? How diverging views of communist past undermine the China-CEE ‘16 1 platform’
Popis výsledku anglicky
China and the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries have been engaged recently in dynamic diplomatic exchanges under the umbrella of 16+1 platform and the Belt and Road Initiative. The article offers an explanation of why the massive Chinese diplomatic effort did not lead to an improved image of China in the CEE region. We adopt the approach of cultural sociology and focus on how the two sides’ ‘meaning structures’ relate to each other. It is argued that main China’s discourse frame of ‘traditional friendship’ based on the shared socialist past is not well received in most of the CEE region which has quite problematic view of Communism due to own historic experience. The dissonance between the Chinese friendly rhetoric and the CEE lukewarm reception imply some deep-cutting differences when it comes to views of history which have significant political implications for current and future relations between the two sides.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
O - Projekt operacniho programu
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Asia Europe Journal
ISSN
1610-2932
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
397-412
Kód UT WoS článku
000557512400007
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85074276553