The English possessive -s morpheme from a diachronic, a synchronic and a cross-linguistic perspective
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73604072" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73604072 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://pdf.uhk.cz/hkjas/pi/pdf/vol7nr1_2020.pdf#page=57" target="_blank" >http://pdf.uhk.cz/hkjas/pi/pdf/vol7nr1_2020.pdf#page=57</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The English possessive -s morpheme from a diachronic, a synchronic and a cross-linguistic perspective
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article shows the diachronic development of the English possessive morpheme. It explains that the present day -s morpheme can be best analyzed as a special clitic as in Anderson (“The English Group-genitive”). Although the possessive -s morpheme diachronically goes back to the genitive case, in modern English its characteristics are different. The treatment of the possessive -s morpheme in traditional grammars does not satisfactorily account for the above-mentioned distinction. Therefore, the criteria for distinguishing between inflectional affixes and special clitics are stipulated and they include: head and non-head marking, agreement within NPs, the promiscuous attachment and no idiosyncratic shapes. Subsequently, when the criteria are applied, the comparison between the -s morpheme and its Old English ancestor, the genitive case can be made. Also, further stages in the diachronic development of the -s morpheme are analyzed. Finally, on the basis of our criteria, the -s morpheme is contrasted crosslinguistically with Swedish and Czech possessives. It has been suggested that the English -s morpheme patterns alike with its Swedish counterpart, while Czech possessives and Old English genitives reveal characteristics typical for inflectional affixes. At the same time, Czech possessives differ in some respects from Old English inflectional genitives and share some similarities with the English possessive -s morpheme. More concretely, Czech possessives enter into competition with genitive constructions and there are several restrictions imposed on their productivity.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The English possessive -s morpheme from a diachronic, a synchronic and a cross-linguistic perspective
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article shows the diachronic development of the English possessive morpheme. It explains that the present day -s morpheme can be best analyzed as a special clitic as in Anderson (“The English Group-genitive”). Although the possessive -s morpheme diachronically goes back to the genitive case, in modern English its characteristics are different. The treatment of the possessive -s morpheme in traditional grammars does not satisfactorily account for the above-mentioned distinction. Therefore, the criteria for distinguishing between inflectional affixes and special clitics are stipulated and they include: head and non-head marking, agreement within NPs, the promiscuous attachment and no idiosyncratic shapes. Subsequently, when the criteria are applied, the comparison between the -s morpheme and its Old English ancestor, the genitive case can be made. Also, further stages in the diachronic development of the -s morpheme are analyzed. Finally, on the basis of our criteria, the -s morpheme is contrasted crosslinguistically with Swedish and Czech possessives. It has been suggested that the English -s morpheme patterns alike with its Swedish counterpart, while Czech possessives and Old English genitives reveal characteristics typical for inflectional affixes. At the same time, Czech possessives differ in some respects from Old English inflectional genitives and share some similarities with the English possessive -s morpheme. More concretely, Czech possessives enter into competition with genitive constructions and there are several restrictions imposed on their productivity.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Hradec Králové Journal of Anglophone Studies
ISSN
2336-3347
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
7
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
57-69
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—