Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The English possessive -s morpheme from a diachronic, a synchronic and a cross-linguistic perspective

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73604072" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73604072 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://pdf.uhk.cz/hkjas/pi/pdf/vol7nr1_2020.pdf#page=57" target="_blank" >http://pdf.uhk.cz/hkjas/pi/pdf/vol7nr1_2020.pdf#page=57</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The English possessive -s morpheme from a diachronic, a synchronic and a cross-linguistic perspective

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article shows the diachronic development of the English possessive morpheme. It explains that the present day -s morpheme can be best analyzed as a special clitic as in Anderson (“The English Group-genitive”). Although the possessive -s morpheme diachronically goes back to the genitive case, in modern English its characteristics are different. The treatment of the possessive -s morpheme in traditional grammars does not satisfactorily account for the above-mentioned distinction. Therefore, the criteria for distinguishing between inflectional affixes and special clitics are stipulated and they include: head and non-head marking, agreement within NPs, the promiscuous attachment and no idiosyncratic shapes. Subsequently, when the criteria are applied, the comparison between the -s morpheme and its Old English ancestor, the genitive case can be made. Also, further stages in the diachronic development of the -s morpheme are analyzed. Finally, on the basis of our criteria, the -s morpheme is contrasted crosslinguistically with Swedish and Czech possessives. It has been suggested that the English -s morpheme patterns alike with its Swedish counterpart, while Czech possessives and Old English genitives reveal characteristics typical for inflectional affixes. At the same time, Czech possessives differ in some respects from Old English inflectional genitives and share some similarities with the English possessive -s morpheme. More concretely, Czech possessives enter into competition with genitive constructions and there are several restrictions imposed on their productivity.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The English possessive -s morpheme from a diachronic, a synchronic and a cross-linguistic perspective

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article shows the diachronic development of the English possessive morpheme. It explains that the present day -s morpheme can be best analyzed as a special clitic as in Anderson (“The English Group-genitive”). Although the possessive -s morpheme diachronically goes back to the genitive case, in modern English its characteristics are different. The treatment of the possessive -s morpheme in traditional grammars does not satisfactorily account for the above-mentioned distinction. Therefore, the criteria for distinguishing between inflectional affixes and special clitics are stipulated and they include: head and non-head marking, agreement within NPs, the promiscuous attachment and no idiosyncratic shapes. Subsequently, when the criteria are applied, the comparison between the -s morpheme and its Old English ancestor, the genitive case can be made. Also, further stages in the diachronic development of the -s morpheme are analyzed. Finally, on the basis of our criteria, the -s morpheme is contrasted crosslinguistically with Swedish and Czech possessives. It has been suggested that the English -s morpheme patterns alike with its Swedish counterpart, while Czech possessives and Old English genitives reveal characteristics typical for inflectional affixes. At the same time, Czech possessives differ in some respects from Old English inflectional genitives and share some similarities with the English possessive -s morpheme. More concretely, Czech possessives enter into competition with genitive constructions and there are several restrictions imposed on their productivity.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60203 - Linguistics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Hradec Králové Journal of Anglophone Studies

  • ISSN

    2336-3347

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    7

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    13

  • Strana od-do

    57-69

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus