Evaluating Food and Beverage Experience: Paradoxes of the Normativity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F20%3A73604486" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/20:73604486 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11210/20:10422020

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/evaluating-food-and-beverage-experience-paradoxes-of-the-normativity/" target="_blank" >http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/evaluating-food-and-beverage-experience-paradoxes-of-the-normativity/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0033" target="_blank" >10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0033</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Evaluating Food and Beverage Experience: Paradoxes of the Normativity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article is concerned with an analysis of semantics and the normativity of evaluative judgments, in which “aesthetic concepts” and “predicates of personal taste” are used in the context of the evaluation of selected cultural forms (foods and beverages). Qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews with representatives in four categories of actors in the cultural field (non-experts, fans, makers, and professional critics) are analyzed. In the light of the findings, theories of aesthetic judgment are critically assessed, which on the one hand, postulate the categorical semantic and normative difference between aesthetic concepts and predicates of personal taste and, on the other hand, conceive aesthetic disputes from an epistemological point of view and do not sufficiently take into account their pragmatic context. In conclusion, a functional analysis of the semantics and normativity of evaluative judgments is presented, in which the speakers use terms from the field of aesthetics.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Evaluating Food and Beverage Experience: Paradoxes of the Normativity

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article is concerned with an analysis of semantics and the normativity of evaluative judgments, in which “aesthetic concepts” and “predicates of personal taste” are used in the context of the evaluation of selected cultural forms (foods and beverages). Qualitative data obtained through semi-structured interviews with representatives in four categories of actors in the cultural field (non-experts, fans, makers, and professional critics) are analyzed. In the light of the findings, theories of aesthetic judgment are critically assessed, which on the one hand, postulate the categorical semantic and normative difference between aesthetic concepts and predicates of personal taste and, on the other hand, conceive aesthetic disputes from an epistemological point of view and do not sufficiently take into account their pragmatic context. In conclusion, a functional analysis of the semantics and normativity of evaluative judgments is presented, in which the speakers use terms from the field of aesthetics.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Eidos: a journal for philosophy of culture

ISSN

2544-302X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

99-112

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—