One crisis after another? How much has the covid-19 pandemic impacted opinions on welfare-state priorities
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F21%3A73606779" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/21:73606779 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/29/1/1237" target="_blank" >https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/29/1/1237</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46585/sp29011237" target="_blank" >10.46585/sp29011237</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
One crisis after another? How much has the covid-19 pandemic impacted opinions on welfare-state priorities
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
With rising spending during the COVID-19 pandemic, the state has become involved in decision-making in areas where it has held back for years. In the case of housing the state’s role has declined sharply since 1989, and the expectation that housing is the private responsibility of each individual and his or her family has strengthened over time as has the homeownership norm. Many measures introduced in the acute phase of the pandemic related in some way to housing and housing quality, such as efforts to ensure social distancing, reduce social contacts, etc. State interventions correspond to the normative assumption that, with some exceptions, the state should not get involved in housing. In this study, we examine the effects of three global crises – the financial crisis, housing affordability, and the pandemic – based on how citizens rank the priorities of the welfare state. Special attention is paid to housing support and how young people differ in evaluation of welfare state priorities. The changes in public opinion during the pandemic resemble a Mikado game, a game of pick-up sticks, with health care being deemed the highest priority set apart from the barely distinguishable cluster of other welfare state provisions.
Název v anglickém jazyce
One crisis after another? How much has the covid-19 pandemic impacted opinions on welfare-state priorities
Popis výsledku anglicky
With rising spending during the COVID-19 pandemic, the state has become involved in decision-making in areas where it has held back for years. In the case of housing the state’s role has declined sharply since 1989, and the expectation that housing is the private responsibility of each individual and his or her family has strengthened over time as has the homeownership norm. Many measures introduced in the acute phase of the pandemic related in some way to housing and housing quality, such as efforts to ensure social distancing, reduce social contacts, etc. State interventions correspond to the normative assumption that, with some exceptions, the state should not get involved in housing. In this study, we examine the effects of three global crises – the financial crisis, housing affordability, and the pandemic – based on how citizens rank the priorities of the welfare state. Special attention is paid to housing support and how young people differ in evaluation of welfare state priorities. The changes in public opinion during the pandemic resemble a Mikado game, a game of pick-up sticks, with health care being deemed the highest priority set apart from the barely distinguishable cluster of other welfare state provisions.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA19-07402S" target="_blank" >GA19-07402S: Dráhy bydlení miléniálů: Rostoucí napětí mezi normalizací vlastnického bydlení a zhoršující se finanční dostupností bydlení v ČR</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration
ISSN
1211-555X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
29
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
1-11
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85104506881