Universální život a život lidský. K ontologii přírody u Jana Patočky a Maurice Merleau-Pontyho

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F21%3A73608406" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/21:73608406 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://reflexe.flu.cas.cz/archiv/reflexe-60/universalni-zivot-a-zivot-lidsky-k-ontologii-prirody-u-jana-patocky-a-maurice-merleau-pontyho/" target="_blank" >http://reflexe.flu.cas.cz/archiv/reflexe-60/universalni-zivot-a-zivot-lidsky-k-ontologii-prirody-u-jana-patocky-a-maurice-merleau-pontyho/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2021.17" target="_blank" >10.14712/25337637.2021.17</a>

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

Universální život a život lidský. K ontologii přírody u Jana Patočky a Maurice Merleau-Pontyho

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The present article has two objectives. One is to elucidate the philosophical approach presented in the so-called Strahov Systematic Manuscripts of Jan Patočka in terms of consciousness and nature. The other is to compare this philosophical approach with Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s theses on nature, as elaborated in 1956–1961, and to point out some advantages and limitations of both approaches. In our opinion, Patočka’s philosophical approach consists, on the one hand, in a descriptive analysis of human experience, which he understands as a pre-reflective self-relationship pointing towards the consciousness of the world. On the other hand, on the basis of this descriptive analysis Patočka consequently explicates all non-human life, inorganic matter, and finally the whole of nature as life in its own right, the essence of which is also a certain self-relation with a tendency towards consciousness. The article then briefly presents Merleau-Ponty’s theses on nature, and finally compares them with Patočka’s overall theses on nature. The advantage of Patočka’s notion of nature as against Merleau-Ponty’s is that, in Patočka’s view, nature encompasses both the principle of unity and individuality. On the other hand, the advantage of Merleau-Ponty’s understanding of nature as against Patočka’s lies in the consistent interconnectedness of the infinite life of nature and the finite life of individual beings.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Universal Life and Human Life. On the ontology of nature in Jan Patočka and Maurice Merleau-Ponty

Popis výsledku anglicky

The present article has two objectives. One is to elucidate the philosophical approach presented in the so-called Strahov Systematic Manuscripts of Jan Patočka in terms of consciousness and nature. The other is to compare this philosophical approach with Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s theses on nature, as elaborated in 1956–1961, and to point out some advantages and limitations of both approaches. In our opinion, Patočka’s philosophical approach consists, on the one hand, in a descriptive analysis of human experience, which he understands as a pre-reflective self-relationship pointing towards the consciousness of the world. On the other hand, on the basis of this descriptive analysis Patočka consequently explicates all non-human life, inorganic matter, and finally the whole of nature as life in its own right, the essence of which is also a certain self-relation with a tendency towards consciousness. The article then briefly presents Merleau-Ponty’s theses on nature, and finally compares them with Patočka’s overall theses on nature. The advantage of Patočka’s notion of nature as against Merleau-Ponty’s is that, in Patočka’s view, nature encompasses both the principle of unity and individuality. On the other hand, the advantage of Merleau-Ponty’s understanding of nature as against Patočka’s lies in the consistent interconnectedness of the infinite life of nature and the finite life of individual beings.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GJ16-17984Y" target="_blank" >GJ16-17984Y: Kořeny Merleau-Pontyho převrácení objektivistického paradigmatu v přednáškách z Collège de France</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Reflexe

ISSN

0862-6901

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

60

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

35

Strana od-do

29-63

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85115815106