COMPLICATED GRIEF IN THE ERA COVID-19-SCOPING REVIEW
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F21%3A73609368" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/21:73609368 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989592:15260/21:73609368
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000720299800005" target="_blank" >https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000720299800005</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
COMPLICATED GRIEF IN THE ERA COVID-19-SCOPING REVIEW
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Background: the aim of this study is to investigate how complicated grief is examined in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in current traceable sources. The following two research questions were established. What methods have been used to examine complicated grieving in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic? What conclusions do the presented studies reach? Methods: Design: A review study. Primary research articles have been searched using a combination of keywords - complicated mourning, complicated grief, protracted (prolonged) mourning - in the Scopus, Web of Science, National Library of Medicine PubMed, EBSCO, MEDVIK, PUBMED, and BMC databases. Exclusion criteria: Since this was not a primary study, the study was not available in full text; the research methodology was not clearly described. The data were processed using thematic analysis by sorting method. Conclusion: The analyzed studies focused mainly on the reflection of the situation of survivors who themselves had experienced COVID-19 and at the same time found themselves in the role of survivors. However, all studies point to the importance of providing professional support to the bereaved, regardless of whether their grief is complicated or not. However, the paradigm of medicalization of grief may certainly not be the desired approach in bereavement care.
Název v anglickém jazyce
COMPLICATED GRIEF IN THE ERA COVID-19-SCOPING REVIEW
Popis výsledku anglicky
Background: the aim of this study is to investigate how complicated grief is examined in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in current traceable sources. The following two research questions were established. What methods have been used to examine complicated grieving in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic? What conclusions do the presented studies reach? Methods: Design: A review study. Primary research articles have been searched using a combination of keywords - complicated mourning, complicated grief, protracted (prolonged) mourning - in the Scopus, Web of Science, National Library of Medicine PubMed, EBSCO, MEDVIK, PUBMED, and BMC databases. Exclusion criteria: Since this was not a primary study, the study was not available in full text; the research methodology was not clearly described. The data were processed using thematic analysis by sorting method. Conclusion: The analyzed studies focused mainly on the reflection of the situation of survivors who themselves had experienced COVID-19 and at the same time found themselves in the role of survivors. However, all studies point to the importance of providing professional support to the bereaved, regardless of whether their grief is complicated or not. However, the paradigm of medicalization of grief may certainly not be the desired approach in bereavement care.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
ACTA MISSIOLOGICA
ISSN
1337-7515
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
52-66
Kód UT WoS článku
000720299800005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—