Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Participatory Budgeting: Case Study of Possible Causes of Failures

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F21%3A73609778" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/21:73609778 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://sjps.fsvucm.sk/index.php/sjps/article/view/243" target="_blank" >http://sjps.fsvucm.sk/index.php/sjps/article/view/243</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.210202" target="_blank" >10.34135/sjps.210202</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Participatory Budgeting: Case Study of Possible Causes of Failures

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Participatory budgeting is perhaps the most widespread and popular form of democratic innovation. It is often identified as an appropriate tool to deepen the democracy at the local level. The text shows that this is not always the case, as some elected officials may use it as a innovation “façade” or its design suffers from various forms of imperfections leading to its failure to be implemented. The authors focus on the practice of participatory budgeting and its failures in the Czech Republic. Through the empirical testing of causal mechanism, the article reveals the main causes of that failure, in the case of its implementation in Prague 7 borough. The mechanism presented is based on the theory-testing minimal process-tracing design in which part of the findings of the previous research have been tested. It also attempts to support empirically only the significant steps of the mechanism between cause and outcome. In particular, the three scope conditions are tested: political support, sufficient funding for participatory budgeting and the existence of a source of know-how. Authors conclude that in the selected case, there was a domino effect of failure, with successive failures in all observed conditions, which ultimately led to a complete brake of causal mechanism and failure of participatory budgeting tool.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Participatory Budgeting: Case Study of Possible Causes of Failures

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Participatory budgeting is perhaps the most widespread and popular form of democratic innovation. It is often identified as an appropriate tool to deepen the democracy at the local level. The text shows that this is not always the case, as some elected officials may use it as a innovation “façade” or its design suffers from various forms of imperfections leading to its failure to be implemented. The authors focus on the practice of participatory budgeting and its failures in the Czech Republic. Through the empirical testing of causal mechanism, the article reveals the main causes of that failure, in the case of its implementation in Prague 7 borough. The mechanism presented is based on the theory-testing minimal process-tracing design in which part of the findings of the previous research have been tested. It also attempts to support empirically only the significant steps of the mechanism between cause and outcome. In particular, the three scope conditions are tested: political support, sufficient funding for participatory budgeting and the existence of a source of know-how. Authors conclude that in the selected case, there was a domino effect of failure, with successive failures in all observed conditions, which ultimately led to a complete brake of causal mechanism and failure of participatory budgeting tool.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA17-20569S" target="_blank" >GA17-20569S: Demokratické inovace na lokální úrovni - případová studie České republiky, Polska a Slovenska</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Slovak Journal of Political Science

  • ISSN

    1335-9096

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    21

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    SK - Slovenská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    22

  • Strana od-do

    139-160

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85127492560