Participatory Budgeting: Case Study of Possible Causes of Failures
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F21%3A73609778" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/21:73609778 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://sjps.fsvucm.sk/index.php/sjps/article/view/243" target="_blank" >http://sjps.fsvucm.sk/index.php/sjps/article/view/243</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34135/sjps.210202" target="_blank" >10.34135/sjps.210202</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Participatory Budgeting: Case Study of Possible Causes of Failures
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Participatory budgeting is perhaps the most widespread and popular form of democratic innovation. It is often identified as an appropriate tool to deepen the democracy at the local level. The text shows that this is not always the case, as some elected officials may use it as a innovation “façade” or its design suffers from various forms of imperfections leading to its failure to be implemented. The authors focus on the practice of participatory budgeting and its failures in the Czech Republic. Through the empirical testing of causal mechanism, the article reveals the main causes of that failure, in the case of its implementation in Prague 7 borough. The mechanism presented is based on the theory-testing minimal process-tracing design in which part of the findings of the previous research have been tested. It also attempts to support empirically only the significant steps of the mechanism between cause and outcome. In particular, the three scope conditions are tested: political support, sufficient funding for participatory budgeting and the existence of a source of know-how. Authors conclude that in the selected case, there was a domino effect of failure, with successive failures in all observed conditions, which ultimately led to a complete brake of causal mechanism and failure of participatory budgeting tool.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Participatory Budgeting: Case Study of Possible Causes of Failures
Popis výsledku anglicky
Participatory budgeting is perhaps the most widespread and popular form of democratic innovation. It is often identified as an appropriate tool to deepen the democracy at the local level. The text shows that this is not always the case, as some elected officials may use it as a innovation “façade” or its design suffers from various forms of imperfections leading to its failure to be implemented. The authors focus on the practice of participatory budgeting and its failures in the Czech Republic. Through the empirical testing of causal mechanism, the article reveals the main causes of that failure, in the case of its implementation in Prague 7 borough. The mechanism presented is based on the theory-testing minimal process-tracing design in which part of the findings of the previous research have been tested. It also attempts to support empirically only the significant steps of the mechanism between cause and outcome. In particular, the three scope conditions are tested: political support, sufficient funding for participatory budgeting and the existence of a source of know-how. Authors conclude that in the selected case, there was a domino effect of failure, with successive failures in all observed conditions, which ultimately led to a complete brake of causal mechanism and failure of participatory budgeting tool.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA17-20569S" target="_blank" >GA17-20569S: Demokratické inovace na lokální úrovni - případová studie České republiky, Polska a Slovenska</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Slovak Journal of Political Science
ISSN
1335-9096
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
139-160
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85127492560