Taiwan’s Road to an Asylum Law: Who, When, How, and Why Not Yet?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F22%3A73609938" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/22:73609938 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-021-00644-y" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-021-00644-y</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00644-y" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12142-021-00644-y</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Taiwan’s Road to an Asylum Law: Who, When, How, and Why Not Yet?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Taiwan is considered to be one of the most progressive countries in Asia but has no asylum law. Does it need one? Many in Taiwan, including officials and politicians, claim that the regulations that are currently in place are sufficient. There are, how- ever, some people in Taiwan who require protection, and the government is not able to respond effectively in the absence of an asylum law. The author has identified several different groups in Taiwan that would benefit from an asylum law — from Hong Kong protesters facing persecution, through Chinese dissidents or descendants of the ROC army from the Thai-Myanmar border region, to Turkish people with revoked passports; grouped into two major categories — persons from the PRC, Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau (group 1) and persons from other countries (group 2). The draft of the asylum law has been sitting in the Parliament for 14 years, and the reason for it not yet having passed is the “China Factor.” The Taiwan-China relation- ship thus cannot be disconnected from this issue, and the article discusses the three most common concerns with regard to this in the Taiwanese society. While these are legitimate concerns, they could be solved by adopting a dual asylum system dealing with group 1 and group 2 separately. Compared to UN member countries, Taiwan is on its own when it comes to the asylum issue, although adopting an asylum law is part of a broader push to bring Taiwan’s legal system in line with international human rights law. The article provides a comprehensive description and analysis of the refugee situation in Taiwan; it is based on document studies and interviews con- ducted in Taipei in autumn 2020.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Taiwan’s Road to an Asylum Law: Who, When, How, and Why Not Yet?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Taiwan is considered to be one of the most progressive countries in Asia but has no asylum law. Does it need one? Many in Taiwan, including officials and politicians, claim that the regulations that are currently in place are sufficient. There are, how- ever, some people in Taiwan who require protection, and the government is not able to respond effectively in the absence of an asylum law. The author has identified several different groups in Taiwan that would benefit from an asylum law — from Hong Kong protesters facing persecution, through Chinese dissidents or descendants of the ROC army from the Thai-Myanmar border region, to Turkish people with revoked passports; grouped into two major categories — persons from the PRC, Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau (group 1) and persons from other countries (group 2). The draft of the asylum law has been sitting in the Parliament for 14 years, and the reason for it not yet having passed is the “China Factor.” The Taiwan-China relation- ship thus cannot be disconnected from this issue, and the article discusses the three most common concerns with regard to this in the Taiwanese society. While these are legitimate concerns, they could be solved by adopting a dual asylum system dealing with group 1 and group 2 separately. Compared to UN member countries, Taiwan is on its own when it comes to the asylum issue, although adopting an asylum law is part of a broader push to bring Taiwan’s legal system in line with international human rights law. The article provides a comprehensive description and analysis of the refugee situation in Taiwan; it is based on document studies and interviews con- ducted in Taipei in autumn 2020.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
O - Projekt operacniho programu
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Human Rights Review
ISSN
1524-8879
e-ISSN
1874-6306
Svazek periodika
23
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
24
Strana od-do
"241–264"
Kód UT WoS článku
000741561600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85122877152