Post-Soviet agrarian transformations in the Russian far east. does china matter?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F23%3A73612702" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/23:73612702 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15387216.2022.2064892?scroll=top&needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15387216.2022.2064892?scroll=top&needAccess=true</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2022.2064892" target="_blank" >10.1080/15387216.2022.2064892</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Post-Soviet agrarian transformations in the Russian far east. does china matter?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Since the mid-2000s, the Russian Far East (RFE) has seen a revival of agriculture accompanied by rapid agrarian transformation that has taken a unique form because of the area’s proximity to China. However, the existing literature either does not recognize Chinese presence or only studies it in terms of capitalist relationships transplanted directly from China and isolated from local realities. This paper seeks to remedy this oversight by exploring the influence of the multifaceted Chinese presence on RFE agriculture. We use the concept of social topology to demonstrate how different forms of economic life have not evolved as “Russian” or “Chinese,” but instead present a bundle of capitalist and non-capitalist relationships that are continuously changing and rewriting themselves. We also explain the observed effect of China’s simultaneous presence and absence in RFE’s agriculture: Chinese agricultural practices are tightly embedded in local social networks and are loosely tethered to local infrastructure, but the Chinese presence also manifests in perceptions and imaginaries that influence and determine the strategies of the Russian state, agroholdings, and Russian farmers.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Post-Soviet agrarian transformations in the Russian far east. does china matter?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Since the mid-2000s, the Russian Far East (RFE) has seen a revival of agriculture accompanied by rapid agrarian transformation that has taken a unique form because of the area’s proximity to China. However, the existing literature either does not recognize Chinese presence or only studies it in terms of capitalist relationships transplanted directly from China and isolated from local realities. This paper seeks to remedy this oversight by exploring the influence of the multifaceted Chinese presence on RFE agriculture. We use the concept of social topology to demonstrate how different forms of economic life have not evolved as “Russian” or “Chinese,” but instead present a bundle of capitalist and non-capitalist relationships that are continuously changing and rewriting themselves. We also explain the observed effect of China’s simultaneous presence and absence in RFE’s agriculture: Chinese agricultural practices are tightly embedded in local social networks and are loosely tethered to local infrastructure, but the Chinese presence also manifests in perceptions and imaginaries that influence and determine the strategies of the Russian state, agroholdings, and Russian farmers.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

O - Projekt operacniho programu

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

EURASIAN GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS

ISSN

1538-7216

e-ISSN

1938-2863

Svazek periodika

64

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7-8

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

27

Strana od-do

943-969

Kód UT WoS článku

000782338700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85129189626