Structural semiology, Peirce, and biolinguistics
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F23%3A73620007" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/23:73620007 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2022-0058/html" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2022-0058/html</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2022-0058" target="_blank" >10.1515/sem-2022-0058</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Structural semiology, Peirce, and biolinguistics
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Peirce's sign model is introduced as incompatible with structural semi-ology in the majority of semiotics textbooks. In this paper, I would like to argue against this general polarization of the semiotic discipline. I focus on compatibilities between Lucien Tesnière's syntactic theory (verbal valency) and Peirce's logic of relatives. My main argument is that structural linguistics is not necessarily dyadic, and that Peirce's sign doctrine is perfectly structural. To define the structural approach in Peirce, I analyze the notions of form (structure) and substance in Hjelmslev and Peirce. The aim of my argument is to contribute to attempts to introduce Peirce's theory to the field of linguistics in the hope that such an integration will be beneficiary for general linguistics. To extend and support my argument , I provide some examples from biology where Peirce's theory has been applied. I demonstrate an analogy between the biological structures of proteins and the structure of a sentence with Peirce's own writings. I consequently introduce Peirce as the first structural semiologist and as the first biolinguist.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Structural semiology, Peirce, and biolinguistics
Popis výsledku anglicky
Peirce's sign model is introduced as incompatible with structural semi-ology in the majority of semiotics textbooks. In this paper, I would like to argue against this general polarization of the semiotic discipline. I focus on compatibilities between Lucien Tesnière's syntactic theory (verbal valency) and Peirce's logic of relatives. My main argument is that structural linguistics is not necessarily dyadic, and that Peirce's sign doctrine is perfectly structural. To define the structural approach in Peirce, I analyze the notions of form (structure) and substance in Hjelmslev and Peirce. The aim of my argument is to contribute to attempts to introduce Peirce's theory to the field of linguistics in the hope that such an integration will be beneficiary for general linguistics. To extend and support my argument , I provide some examples from biology where Peirce's theory has been applied. I demonstrate an analogy between the biological structures of proteins and the structure of a sentence with Peirce's own writings. I consequently introduce Peirce as the first structural semiologist and as the first biolinguist.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
SEMIOTICA
ISSN
0037-1998
e-ISSN
1613-3692
Svazek periodika
2023
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
21
Strana od-do
1-21
Kód UT WoS článku
001063485300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85162868888