Lotmanian referentiality and (cultural) semantics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F24%3A73626792" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/24:73626792 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/css-2024-2026/html" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/css-2024-2026/html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/css-2024-2026" target="_blank" >10.1515/css-2024-2026</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Lotmanian referentiality and (cultural) semantics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Lotmanian semiotics comprises a complex and wide-encompassing system for understanding meaning-making in culture and cultural dynamics more generally. Its complexity is compounded by Lotman’s historically and artistically minded orientation. In this paper we propose a brief rereading of a particular aspect of Lotmanian theory – what we will term Lotmanian semantics – based on an interpretation of modeling systems theory that, by our account, retains the form of the original by appealing to the notion of language employed by Lotman and deployed as propositional thought qua language. We revisit Sebeok’s critique of modeling systems theory and find it unnecessary for the interpretation that we make of Lotman’s semiotics, and we then propose a two-level interpretation of the theory that allows us to describe both perceptual and cultural phenomena as different semantic kinds.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Lotmanian referentiality and (cultural) semantics

Popis výsledku anglicky

Lotmanian semiotics comprises a complex and wide-encompassing system for understanding meaning-making in culture and cultural dynamics more generally. Its complexity is compounded by Lotman’s historically and artistically minded orientation. In this paper we propose a brief rereading of a particular aspect of Lotmanian theory – what we will term Lotmanian semantics – based on an interpretation of modeling systems theory that, by our account, retains the form of the original by appealing to the notion of language employed by Lotman and deployed as propositional thought qua language. We revisit Sebeok’s critique of modeling systems theory and find it unnecessary for the interpretation that we make of Lotman’s semiotics, and we then propose a two-level interpretation of the theory that allows us to describe both perceptual and cultural phenomena as different semantic kinds.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60203 - Linguistics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Chinese Semiotic Studies

ISSN

2198-9605

e-ISSN

2198-9613

Svazek periodika

2024

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

20(4)

Stát vydavatele periodika

CN - Čínská lidová republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

537-547

Kód UT WoS článku

001365282000004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85213450422