Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Evaluation of Errors in Road Signs in a Long Roadwork Zone Using a Naturalistic Driving Study

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F25%3A73630680" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/25:73630680 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3755" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3755</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su17083755" target="_blank" >10.3390/su17083755</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Evaluation of Errors in Road Signs in a Long Roadwork Zone Using a Naturalistic Driving Study

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The paper presents an application of a new, simple approach for the naturalistic assessment of road sign quality from a driver’s perspective, using dashboard camera recordings. This method was used to evaluate signage along a 69.6 km road construction zone in Poland associated with the phased upgrade of a dual carriageway with unlimited access into a motorway. The analysis focused on three distinct phases of the roadwork: the beginning of roadwork, the progress of roadwork, and finishing roadwork. The correctness, visibility, and quality of the road signs were assessed on a specially developed scale. The study found that 1135 road signs were unnecessary, which was equal to 36% of all signs. The majority of all signs (48.1%) indicated prohibition: more than one third (33.6%) of them were speed limit signs, of which 52% were posted without the need. It was demonstrated that the simple method applied in this study can be considered a useful tool to identify deficiencies in signage, which could ultimately improve road safety and make road management more sustainable. Moreover, this study confirmed again that the use of appropriate video recordings makes it faster and easier to conduct an inventory of road signs.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Evaluation of Errors in Road Signs in a Long Roadwork Zone Using a Naturalistic Driving Study

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The paper presents an application of a new, simple approach for the naturalistic assessment of road sign quality from a driver’s perspective, using dashboard camera recordings. This method was used to evaluate signage along a 69.6 km road construction zone in Poland associated with the phased upgrade of a dual carriageway with unlimited access into a motorway. The analysis focused on three distinct phases of the roadwork: the beginning of roadwork, the progress of roadwork, and finishing roadwork. The correctness, visibility, and quality of the road signs were assessed on a specially developed scale. The study found that 1135 road signs were unnecessary, which was equal to 36% of all signs. The majority of all signs (48.1%) indicated prohibition: more than one third (33.6%) of them were speed limit signs, of which 52% were posted without the need. It was demonstrated that the simple method applied in this study can be considered a useful tool to identify deficiencies in signage, which could ultimately improve road safety and make road management more sustainable. Moreover, this study confirmed again that the use of appropriate video recordings makes it faster and easier to conduct an inventory of road signs.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20104 - Transport engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Sustainability

  • ISSN

    2071-1050

  • e-ISSN

    2071-1050

  • Svazek periodika

    2025

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    17(8)

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CH - Švýcarská konfederace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

    1-14

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001475824500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105003671950