The influence of the method of administration on children’s performance in the lexical task LITMUS CLT-sk

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F25%3A73633123" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/25:73633123 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/article/view/673/223" target="_blank" >https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/article/view/673/223</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.69.3.214" target="_blank" >10.51561/cspsych.69.3.214</a>

Jazyk výsledku

slovinština

Název v původním jazyce

Vplyv spôsobu administrácie na výkon detí v lexikálnom teste LITMUS CLT-sk

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Aim. Our contribution focuses on comparing two methods of administration (traditional paper-based and electronic) regarding children&apos;s performance in evaluating their vocabulary using the Cross-Linguistic Lexical Tasks (LITMUS CLT-sk).Methods. To assess the equivalence of both administration methods, the frequency distributions of raw scores in all four subtests were compared in a sample of N = 140 monolingual Slovak-speaking children (age range 36 – 77 months, Mean = 56.39; SD = 11.79). Two groups of children were compared, where age and gender were the controlled variables, as usual. Given that the family&apos;s socioeconomic status and the literacy environment significantly influence a child&apos;s language development, an additional factor—the family&apos;s cultural capital—was controlled. Cultural capital was defined by the highest parental education level and the family&apos;s reading behavior.Results. The results of linear regression demonstrated that neither the method of administration, the family&apos;s cultural capital, nor the gender of the tested children affected their performance in the lexical task. Conversely, age was the only factor significantly associated with the ability to produce nouns (p &lt; .001) and produce verbs (p = .008) and to a lesser extent, with the ability to understand verbs (p = .08). The noun comprehension subtest shows a ceiling effect, which likely limits sufficient differentiation of performance within the observed sample of children.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The influence of the method of administration on children’s performance in the lexical task LITMUS CLT-sk

Popis výsledku anglicky

The influence of the method of administration on children’s performance in the lexical task LITMUS CLT-sk Aim. The contribution focuses on comparing two methods of administration (traditional paper-based and electronic) regarding children’s performance in evaluating their vocabulary using the Cross-Linguistic Lexical Tasks (LITMUS CLT-sk). Methods. To assess the equivalence of both administration methods, the frequency distributions of raw scores in all four subtests were compared in a sample of N = 140 monolingual Slovak-speaking children (age range 36 - 77 months, Mean = 56.39 months, SD = 11.79). Two groups of children were compared, where age and gender were the controlled variables, as usual. Given that the family,s socioeconomic status and the literacy environment significantly influence a child’s language development, an additional factor—the family’s cultural capital—was controlled. Cultural capital was defined by the highest parental education level and the family’s reading behavior. Results. The results of linear regression demonstrated that neither the method of administration, the family’s cultural capital, nor the gender of the tested children affected their performance in the lexical task. Conversely, age was the only factor significantly associated with the ability to produce nouns (p &lt;.001) and produce verbs (p =.008) and to a lesser extent, with the ability to understand verbs (p =.08). The noun comprehension subtest shows a ceiling effect, which likely limits sufficient differentiation of performance within the observed sample of children.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50102 - Psychology, special (including therapy for learning, speech, hearing, visual and other physical and mental disabilities);

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE

ISSN

0009-062X

e-ISSN

1804-6436

Svazek periodika

69

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

214-234

Kód UT WoS článku

001523652400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105011385192