Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union: How to Understand the ‘Right’ of the Member State to Withdraw the European Union?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F18%3A73587937" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/18:73587937 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73414-9_12" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73414-9_12</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73414-9_12" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-73414-9_12</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union: How to Understand the ‘Right’ of the Member State to Withdraw the European Union?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter focuses on legal aspects, respectively the constitutionalassumptions of the departure of the Member State from the European Union. It offersan analysis of past debates and theoretical models that preceded the official introduc-tion of the exit clause in today’s Article 50 TEU. It also addresses the question of thenature of the withdrawal and casts doubt on the nature of the“right to withdraw.”Article 50 is working with two alternatives on how to leave the Union—a consensualexit and unilateral withdrawal. Although the authors accept the theoretical extremepossibility of unilateral exit without agreement, they also point to the factual necessityof the agreement (that is necessary from the point of view of legal certainty, economicstability, political accountability, and international status of the outgoing state), whichin fact makes the consensual exit the only possible way of terminating membershipand therefore casts doubts on the existence of right to withdraw.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union: How to Understand the ‘Right’ of the Member State to Withdraw the European Union?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter focuses on legal aspects, respectively the constitutionalassumptions of the departure of the Member State from the European Union. It offersan analysis of past debates and theoretical models that preceded the official introduc-tion of the exit clause in today’s Article 50 TEU. It also addresses the question of thenature of the withdrawal and casts doubt on the nature of the“right to withdraw.”Article 50 is working with two alternatives on how to leave the Union—a consensualexit and unilateral withdrawal. Although the authors accept the theoretical extremepossibility of unilateral exit without agreement, they also point to the factual necessityof the agreement (that is necessary from the point of view of legal certainty, economicstability, political accountability, and international status of the outgoing state), whichin fact makes the consensual exit the only possible way of terminating membershipand therefore casts doubts on the existence of right to withdraw.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Brexit - History, Reasoning and Perspectives

ISBN

978-3-319-73413-2

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

199-214

Počet stran knihy

283

Název nakladatele

Springer International Publishing

Místo vydání

Cham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—