Constitutional Review and The Preliminary Ruling Procedure: Commentary on The CCB Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F19%3A73597139" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/19:73597139 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://rozkotova.cld.bz/rww/CYIL-vol-10-2019/136/" target="_blank" >https://rozkotova.cld.bz/rww/CYIL-vol-10-2019/136/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Constitutional Review and The Preliminary Ruling Procedure: Commentary on The CCB Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article analyses the decision of the Czech Constitutional Court II. ÚS 3432/17 in CCB case in which the court limited its review of the obligation of ordinary courts to initiate the preliminary ruling procedure to the EU Court of Justice. Th e Constitutional Court decided to interpret the CILFIT criteria loosely. Consequently, the breach of the obligation to initiate the preliminary ruling procedure under art. 267 TFEU will infringe the Czech Constitutional rules only in limited circumstances. Th us, the Czech Constitutional Court decreased the level of constitutional protection of private parties against the violation of the obligation to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Constitutional Review and The Preliminary Ruling Procedure: Commentary on The CCB Decision of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article analyses the decision of the Czech Constitutional Court II. ÚS 3432/17 in CCB case in which the court limited its review of the obligation of ordinary courts to initiate the preliminary ruling procedure to the EU Court of Justice. Th e Constitutional Court decided to interpret the CILFIT criteria loosely. Consequently, the breach of the obligation to initiate the preliminary ruling procedure under art. 267 TFEU will infringe the Czech Constitutional rules only in limited circumstances. Th us, the Czech Constitutional Court decreased the level of constitutional protection of private parties against the violation of the obligation to refer questions to the EU Court of Justice.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law

ISSN

1805-0565

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2019

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

117-129

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85079864231