Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Interaction between Genocide and Superior Responsibility - Conviction for a Special Intent Crime without Proving Special Intent!?

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F20%3A73601602" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/20:73601602 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333181488" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333181488</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Interaction between Genocide and Superior Responsibility - Conviction for a Special Intent Crime without Proving Special Intent!?

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The treatment of specific intent crimes, particularly with respect to genocide, is one of the most controversial aspects of superior responsibility. This study examines the interaction between genocidal intent and a superior’s omission/failure to prevent or punish crimes committed by the subordinates. In applying superior responsibility to the crime of genocide, there is a debate whether the superior must himself have the necessary genocidal intent, or if he must merely know that his subordinates possessed a genocidal intent. The divergent approaches demonstrated in the ICTY, ICTR and ECCC case law gives rise to a rather ambiguous findings. This article presents the importance of defining the nature of superior responsibility, and demonstrates how different perception of superior responsibility could offer a solution to the treatment of special intent crimes. Superior responsibility and special intent of genocide are well defined by international criminal tribunals and are often the subjects of discussion between academics. However, unique relationship between superior responsibility and special intent crimes has not been yet analysed in a sufficiently comprehensive and complex manner. This study offers an analysis of the relationship between superior responsibility and genocide as a special intent crime, focusing on the concept of superior responsibility and its nature.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Interaction between Genocide and Superior Responsibility - Conviction for a Special Intent Crime without Proving Special Intent!?

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The treatment of specific intent crimes, particularly with respect to genocide, is one of the most controversial aspects of superior responsibility. This study examines the interaction between genocidal intent and a superior’s omission/failure to prevent or punish crimes committed by the subordinates. In applying superior responsibility to the crime of genocide, there is a debate whether the superior must himself have the necessary genocidal intent, or if he must merely know that his subordinates possessed a genocidal intent. The divergent approaches demonstrated in the ICTY, ICTR and ECCC case law gives rise to a rather ambiguous findings. This article presents the importance of defining the nature of superior responsibility, and demonstrates how different perception of superior responsibility could offer a solution to the treatment of special intent crimes. Superior responsibility and special intent of genocide are well defined by international criminal tribunals and are often the subjects of discussion between academics. However, unique relationship between superior responsibility and special intent crimes has not been yet analysed in a sufficiently comprehensive and complex manner. This study offers an analysis of the relationship between superior responsibility and genocide as a special intent crime, focusing on the concept of superior responsibility and its nature.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    The Concept of Genocide in International Criminal Law Developments after Lemkin

  • ISBN

    978-0-367-85819-3

  • Počet stran výsledku

    26

  • Strana od-do

    165-190

  • Počet stran knihy

    306

  • Název nakladatele

    Routledge

  • Místo vydání

    London and New York

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly