Pandemics in Cyberspace - Empire in Search of a Sovereign?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F21%3A73608152" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/21:73608152 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/bjlp-2021-0005" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/bjlp-2021-0005</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2021-0005" target="_blank" >10.2478/bjlp-2021-0005</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Pandemics in Cyberspace - Empire in Search of a Sovereign?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Traditionally, the idea of a sovereign is being connected either with an absolutist ruler (later replaced by &quot;the people&quot;) at the national level, or the nation-state at the international level - at least in the conditions of the Westphalian system created in 1648. Today, on the contrary, we are witnessing a &quot;post-&quot;situation in many respects - post-modernism, post-positivism, but also post-statism - basically being a sort of return to the pre-Westphalian system (see Ondrej Hamuľák, &quot;Lessons from the &apos;Constitutional Mythology&apos; or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration,&quot;DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review Vol. 6, No. 2 (2015); or Danuta Kabat-Rudnicka, &quot;Autonomy or Sovereignty: the Case of the European Union,&quot;International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 20, No. 2 (2020)). However, paternalistic views, prevailing especially in times of crisis and uncertainty, desperately search for a sovereign to lead us from the crises. With regard to cyberattacks and insecurity in the cyberspace this means an effort to subordinate cyberspace to state sovereignty. Still, given the limitations of traditional state-based monopolies of power and legislation, the state as an &quot;analogue sovereign&quot;shrinks in the digital cyberspace rather to a co-sovereign, co-ordinator, or in feudal terms a &quot;senior&quot;vis-à-vis their vassals. The actual ensuring of the tasks of state as a &quot;digital sovereign&quot;is namely often being entrusted to non-state (essentially private-owned) entities, under the threat of legal sanctions. The current situation of constructing &quot;digital sovereignty&quot;of traditional states or of the EU is thus marked by the necessity of cooperation between the state power and those non-state entities which are falling under its analogue jurisdiction. © 2021 Tomáš Gábriš et al., published by Sciendo.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Pandemics in Cyberspace - Empire in Search of a Sovereign?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Traditionally, the idea of a sovereign is being connected either with an absolutist ruler (later replaced by &quot;the people&quot;) at the national level, or the nation-state at the international level - at least in the conditions of the Westphalian system created in 1648. Today, on the contrary, we are witnessing a &quot;post-&quot;situation in many respects - post-modernism, post-positivism, but also post-statism - basically being a sort of return to the pre-Westphalian system (see Ondrej Hamuľák, &quot;Lessons from the &apos;Constitutional Mythology&apos; or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration,&quot;DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review Vol. 6, No. 2 (2015); or Danuta Kabat-Rudnicka, &quot;Autonomy or Sovereignty: the Case of the European Union,&quot;International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 20, No. 2 (2020)). However, paternalistic views, prevailing especially in times of crisis and uncertainty, desperately search for a sovereign to lead us from the crises. With regard to cyberattacks and insecurity in the cyberspace this means an effort to subordinate cyberspace to state sovereignty. Still, given the limitations of traditional state-based monopolies of power and legislation, the state as an &quot;analogue sovereign&quot;shrinks in the digital cyberspace rather to a co-sovereign, co-ordinator, or in feudal terms a &quot;senior&quot;vis-à-vis their vassals. The actual ensuring of the tasks of state as a &quot;digital sovereign&quot;is namely often being entrusted to non-state (essentially private-owned) entities, under the threat of legal sanctions. The current situation of constructing &quot;digital sovereignty&quot;of traditional states or of the EU is thus marked by the necessity of cooperation between the state power and those non-state entities which are falling under its analogue jurisdiction. © 2021 Tomáš Gábriš et al., published by Sciendo.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-27227S" target="_blank" >GA20-27227S: Vytváření, problémy a limity digitální suverenity Evropské unie</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Baltic Journal of Law and Politics

ISSN

2029-0454

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

103-123

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85117703652