Shift from Cultural Property to Cultural Heritage and its possible consequences for International Criminal Law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F21%3A73609062" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/21:73609062 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/priel/article/view/9494/8393" target="_blank" >https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/priel/article/view/9494/8393</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/priel.2021.10.2.02" target="_blank" >10.21697/priel.2021.10.2.02</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Shift from Cultural Property to Cultural Heritage and its possible consequences for International Criminal Law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article examines the content of terms ‘cultural property’ and ’cultural heritage’. It illustrates the continual development in the protection of cultural property that evolved into the concept of cultural heritage. The first part of the article describes differences between the two notions and explains why the term ’cultural heritage’ is more suitable for the current approach to protection of cultural expressions. The second part of the article deals with possible consequences that the conceptual shift from cultural property to cultural heritage can bring to protection under International Criminal Law. It argues that despite the wording of relevant legal documents, it does not explicitly work with the term ’cultural heritage’. The author notes that jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals has already been recognizing this concept and reflecting upon the extent of the term in some of their decisions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Shift from Cultural Property to Cultural Heritage and its possible consequences for International Criminal Law

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article examines the content of terms ‘cultural property’ and ’cultural heritage’. It illustrates the continual development in the protection of cultural property that evolved into the concept of cultural heritage. The first part of the article describes differences between the two notions and explains why the term ’cultural heritage’ is more suitable for the current approach to protection of cultural expressions. The second part of the article deals with possible consequences that the conceptual shift from cultural property to cultural heritage can bring to protection under International Criminal Law. It argues that despite the wording of relevant legal documents, it does not explicitly work with the term ’cultural heritage’. The author notes that jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals has already been recognizing this concept and reflecting upon the extent of the term in some of their decisions.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Polish Review of International and European Law

ISSN

2299-2170

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

37-61

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—