Reimbursement of value of expropriated property under Czech law in light of European legal standards.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F22%3A73613642" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/22:73613642 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://hrcak.srce.hr/280275" target="_blank" >https://hrcak.srce.hr/280275</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.6" target="_blank" >10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reimbursement of value of expropriated property under Czech law in light of European legal standards.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article deals with the provision of reimbursement (restitution) of expropriated property, which is not only in the Czech Republic, one of the basic, obligatory, and constitutional legal conditions of expropriation. According to European requirements, the reimbursement of the value of the expropriated property should always be fair, and adequate, and should fully compensate for the damage caused to the person subject to the expropriation by the interference with his property rights. The basic research question of this article will therefore be, whether the Czech legislation and decision-making practice meet European requirements as well. In means: Does the Czech regulation present a truly full-fledged replacement, respectively reimbursement for the damage caused by expropriation - both in terms of the types of reimbursement and the manner of determination of their amount? Reimbursement of the value of the expropriated property is obligatorily determined in expropriation proceedings based on an expert opinion. Several questions to be answered arise here too, such as ensuring the impartiality and objectivity of the expert valuation, or the method of resolving the collision of several expert opinions with different conclusions. Also, it is not always entirely clear which rights of third parties expire as a result of expropriation and for which ones its appropriate to provide reimbursement. The aim of the following text will therefore be to analyze the current legislation and decision-making practice in the given field, in the context of European and Czech constitutional requirements, identify potential problematic aspects and formulate proposals for solutions de lege ferenda.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reimbursement of value of expropriated property under Czech law in light of European legal standards.

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article deals with the provision of reimbursement (restitution) of expropriated property, which is not only in the Czech Republic, one of the basic, obligatory, and constitutional legal conditions of expropriation. According to European requirements, the reimbursement of the value of the expropriated property should always be fair, and adequate, and should fully compensate for the damage caused to the person subject to the expropriation by the interference with his property rights. The basic research question of this article will therefore be, whether the Czech legislation and decision-making practice meet European requirements as well. In means: Does the Czech regulation present a truly full-fledged replacement, respectively reimbursement for the damage caused by expropriation - both in terms of the types of reimbursement and the manner of determination of their amount? Reimbursement of the value of the expropriated property is obligatorily determined in expropriation proceedings based on an expert opinion. Several questions to be answered arise here too, such as ensuring the impartiality and objectivity of the expert valuation, or the method of resolving the collision of several expert opinions with different conclusions. Also, it is not always entirely clear which rights of third parties expire as a result of expropriation and for which ones its appropriate to provide reimbursement. The aim of the following text will therefore be to analyze the current legislation and decision-making practice in the given field, in the context of European and Czech constitutional requirements, identify potential problematic aspects and formulate proposals for solutions de lege ferenda.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

InterEULawEast

ISSN

1849-3734

e-ISSN

1849-4439

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

HR - Chorvatská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

121-145

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85134650783