“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F22%3A73617470" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/22:73617470 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://sciendo.com/journal/ICLR?tab=issues" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/journal/ICLR?tab=issues</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The protection of human privacy is one of the most disputable topics of European human rights law. That is why the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts is rich in numerous decisions in this area, since human privacy is one of the most violated human rights, especially in the context of the development of digital technologies. Trying to find protection of their rights through institutional mechanisms of human rights (in particular, through the CJEU and the ECtHR), the applicant often finds himself/herself in a more difficult position: he/she becomes even more an object of public discussion. This phenomenon is especially vividly illustrated by the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts in the field of protection of the right to be forgotten, which will be paid attention to in this research. At the same time, some suggestions will also be put forward to strengthen the effectiveness of protecting the confidentiality of applicants in the judicial decisions of the Courts.
Název v anglickém jazyce
“The Right to be Remembered?”: The Contemporary Challenges of the “Streisand Effect” in the European Judicial Reality
Popis výsledku anglicky
The protection of human privacy is one of the most disputable topics of European human rights law. That is why the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts is rich in numerous decisions in this area, since human privacy is one of the most violated human rights, especially in the context of the development of digital technologies. Trying to find protection of their rights through institutional mechanisms of human rights (in particular, through the CJEU and the ECtHR), the applicant often finds himself/herself in a more difficult position: he/she becomes even more an object of public discussion. This phenomenon is especially vividly illustrated by the judicial practice of the European Supranational Courts in the field of protection of the right to be forgotten, which will be paid attention to in this research. At the same time, some suggestions will also be put forward to strengthen the effectiveness of protecting the confidentiality of applicants in the judicial decisions of the Courts.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA20-27227S" target="_blank" >GA20-27227S: Vytváření, problémy a limity digitální suverenity Evropské unie</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International and Comparative Law Review
ISSN
1213-8770
e-ISSN
2464-6601
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
16
Strana od-do
105-120
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85149617509