The relations between the Singapore Mediation Convention and the European Mediation Directive

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F22%3A73618291" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/22:73618291 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://caes.upol.cz/european-studies/" target="_blank" >https://caes.upol.cz/european-studies/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2022-0023" target="_blank" >10.2478/eustu-2022-0023</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The relations between the Singapore Mediation Convention and the European Mediation Directive

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper deals with the Singapore Convention on Mediationfrom United Nations General Assembly in December 2018 and signed inSingapore on 7August 2019.Also with the European Union situation, givenby the existence of the Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliamentand of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civiland commercial matters. EU States haven’t signed the Singapore Convention on Mediation. This paper is trying to analyse the two instruments, theDirective as a harmonisation instrument, maybe opening the field of thepossible usage of the convention and not existing Regulation unifying thelegal ground in the EU. The Singapore Convention on Mediation entersintoforce six months after deposit of the third instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession. EU is now in the position, where a decisionabout new Directive, or maybe the acceptance of the convention must bedecided with accordance to all the dilemmas of the Singapore Convention.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The relations between the Singapore Mediation Convention and the European Mediation Directive

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper deals with the Singapore Convention on Mediationfrom United Nations General Assembly in December 2018 and signed inSingapore on 7August 2019.Also with the European Union situation, givenby the existence of the Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliamentand of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civiland commercial matters. EU States haven’t signed the Singapore Convention on Mediation. This paper is trying to analyse the two instruments, theDirective as a harmonisation instrument, maybe opening the field of thepossible usage of the convention and not existing Regulation unifying thelegal ground in the EU. The Singapore Convention on Mediation entersintoforce six months after deposit of the third instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession. EU is now in the position, where a decisionabout new Directive, or maybe the acceptance of the convention must bedecided with accordance to all the dilemmas of the Singapore Convention.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

European Studies – The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics

ISSN

1805-8809

e-ISSN

2464-6695

Svazek periodika

2022

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

243-262

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85152691358