Frontiers in AI Judiciary: A Contribution to Legal Futurology

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F23%3A73621727" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/23:73621727 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.ies.ee/bahps/acta-baltica/abhps-11-2/03_abhps-2023-2-03.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.ies.ee/bahps/acta-baltica/abhps-11-2/03_abhps-2023-2-03.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2023.2.03" target="_blank" >10.11590/abhps.2023.2.03</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Frontiers in AI Judiciary: A Contribution to Legal Futurology

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article responds to the recent evolution in AI judiciary, especially as presented in China. The authors compare the basic methodological background of Western and Eastern legal systems, concluding that the West is rather inclined to post-positivist methodology in law, which seems incompatible with the full use of AI in legal decision-making. In China, with its more pragmatic approach, the actual process of decision-making might be closer to a new form of technological legal positivism, distinct from Western trends in jurisprudence. Finally, various forms of applicability of AI in law and judiciary are pondered upon, so as to use at least some positive aspects of AI in this sector—albeit with reservations regarding the decision-making proper.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Frontiers in AI Judiciary: A Contribution to Legal Futurology

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article responds to the recent evolution in AI judiciary, especially as presented in China. The authors compare the basic methodological background of Western and Eastern legal systems, concluding that the West is rather inclined to post-positivist methodology in law, which seems incompatible with the full use of AI in legal decision-making. In China, with its more pragmatic approach, the actual process of decision-making might be closer to a new form of technological legal positivism, distinct from Western trends in jurisprudence. Finally, various forms of applicability of AI in law and judiciary are pondered upon, so as to use at least some positive aspects of AI in this sector—albeit with reservations regarding the decision-making proper.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-27227S" target="_blank" >GA20-27227S: Vytváření, problémy a limity digitální suverenity Evropské unie</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum

ISSN

2228-2009

e-ISSN

2228-2017

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

EE - Estonská republika

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

55-75

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85182636458