Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Audiovisual Recording as Evidence in Administrative Proceeding versus the Right to Privacy (from the Point of View of the Czech Republic)

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F24%3A73629868" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/24:73629868 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Audiovisual Recording as Evidence in Administrative Proceeding versus the Right to Privacy (from the Point of View of the Czech Republic)

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    With the development of modern communication and information technologies, Czech public administration bodies are increasingly encountering evidence of an audiovisual nature. Evidence by audiovisual recording is very common, especially in proceedings on administrative offenses, but also in other administrative proceedings. Relatively often in practice there is a situation where such audiovisual recordings (eg camera system recordings, recordings made on a mobile phone, etc.) are made without the consent of the persons concerned, and administrative authorities, or subsequently courts, are forced to assess their applicability in administrative proceedings and then in court proceedings. The basic problem is that such recordings may interfere with the right to privacy guaranteed in particular by Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, resp similarly Article 7 of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. The situation in the Czech Republic is all the more complicated because the performance of audiovisual recordings as evidence is not regulated at all in the Administrative Procedure Code. The subject of this chapter is therefore an analysis of how to resolve in practice this conflict between the right to privacy and the interest of the state and society to punish the perpetrators of the offense. Both the legal regulation and the practice of Czech administrative bodies and courts, as well as the case law of the ECtHR will be taken into account.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Audiovisual Recording as Evidence in Administrative Proceeding versus the Right to Privacy (from the Point of View of the Czech Republic)

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    With the development of modern communication and information technologies, Czech public administration bodies are increasingly encountering evidence of an audiovisual nature. Evidence by audiovisual recording is very common, especially in proceedings on administrative offenses, but also in other administrative proceedings. Relatively often in practice there is a situation where such audiovisual recordings (eg camera system recordings, recordings made on a mobile phone, etc.) are made without the consent of the persons concerned, and administrative authorities, or subsequently courts, are forced to assess their applicability in administrative proceedings and then in court proceedings. The basic problem is that such recordings may interfere with the right to privacy guaranteed in particular by Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, resp similarly Article 7 of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. The situation in the Czech Republic is all the more complicated because the performance of audiovisual recordings as evidence is not regulated at all in the Administrative Procedure Code. The subject of this chapter is therefore an analysis of how to resolve in practice this conflict between the right to privacy and the interest of the state and society to punish the perpetrators of the offense. Both the legal regulation and the practice of Czech administrative bodies and courts, as well as the case law of the ECtHR will be taken into account.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50501 - Law

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    The Right to Privacy

  • ISBN

    978-83-67149-40-2

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    12

  • Strana od-do

    19-30

  • Název nakladatele

    Wydawnictvo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości

  • Místo vydání

    Varšava

  • Místo konání akce

    Varšava

  • Datum konání akce

    1. 6. 2022

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku