Ján Šmigovský as a Traitor to the Uprising.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15220%2F25%3A73633382" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15220/25:73633382 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.vhu.sk/data/att/c76/23121.806e2a.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.vhu.sk/data/att/c76/23121.806e2a.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.69809/vojhist.2025.29.4.5" target="_blank" >10.69809/vojhist.2025.29.4.5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

slovinština

Název v původním jazyce

Ján Šmigovský ako zradca na povstaní

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article focuses on analysing the activities and historical reception of the officer Ján Šmigovský during the existence of the wartime Slovak state, with particular emphasis on his retribution trial. The author rejects the portrayal of Šmigovský as a “controversial” figure in Slovak history, a depiction found primarily in ľudák (referring to Hlinka’s Slovak People’s Party) and neo-ľudák texts, which serves to relativise his activities and the regime as such. These texts depict him as a typical officer who, out of ideological conviction, adapted to and collaborated with the new order after 1939, did not betray his military honour, and is even regarded as a martyr by certain sections of opinion. The article examines three main areas: (1) the retribution trial before the National Court, in which Šmigovský was the first to be tried, convicted, and executed; (2) an assessment of his actions in light of new historical findings that were unknown at the time of the trial or established in court solely through witness testimony; and (3) an analysis of his portrayal and a deconstruction of the myths surrounding him, created by ľudák and neo-ľudák literature from the post-war period to the present.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Ján Šmigovský as a Traitor to the Uprising.

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article focuses on analysing the activities and historical reception of the officer Ján Šmigovský during the existence of the wartime Slovak state, with particular emphasis on his retribution trial. The author rejects the portrayal of Šmigovský as a “controversial” figure in Slovak history, a depiction found primarily in ľudák (referring to Hlinka’s Slovak People’s Party) and neo-ľudák texts, which serves to relativise his activities and the regime as such. These texts depict him as a typical officer who, out of ideological conviction, adapted to and collaborated with the new order after 1939, did not betray his military honour, and is even regarded as a martyr by certain sections of opinion. The article examines three main areas: (1) the retribution trial before the National Court, in which Šmigovský was the first to be tried, convicted, and executed; (2) an assessment of his actions in light of new historical findings that were unknown at the time of the trial or established in court solely through witness testimony; and (3) an analysis of his portrayal and a deconstruction of the myths surrounding him, created by ľudák and neo-ľudák literature from the post-war period to the present.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Vojenská história

ISSN

1335-3314

e-ISSN

1338-7154

Svazek periodika

2025

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

106-130

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105025562595