The Ways Of Punishing Clerics. Episcopal Detentions For Priests – A Case Study of Olomouc Archdiocese in the 19th century

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F17%3A73583303" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/17:73583303 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/kip.2017.6.1-14" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/kip.2017.6.1-14</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/kip.2017.6.1-14" target="_blank" >10.18290/kip.2017.6.1-14</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Ways Of Punishing Clerics. Episcopal Detentions For Priests – A Case Study of Olomouc Archdiocese in the 19th century

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The institution of the house of correction for the clergy (also called “priestly prisons”) represented a special institution for priests who were guilty of violating their duty or manners, but also for priests who were ill (physically or psychologically). The priest who was considered to be reformed (corrected) could be released back into pastoral service. Priests located in clerical prisons were not “dangerous criminals”, but rather offenders. The house of correction in Mírov had its own rules: instructions for the dean of Mohelnice (with the duty of visitation), for the chaplain of Mírov (the superior of the house of correction in Mírov), service staff and for the incarcerated priests, of course. These instructions represented very well thought-out regulations. Based on these, we can also picture the functioning of this institution, and outline the fates of the incarcerated priests (depending upon the preserved archival sources).

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Ways Of Punishing Clerics. Episcopal Detentions For Priests – A Case Study of Olomouc Archdiocese in the 19th century

Popis výsledku anglicky

The institution of the house of correction for the clergy (also called “priestly prisons”) represented a special institution for priests who were guilty of violating their duty or manners, but also for priests who were ill (physically or psychologically). The priest who was considered to be reformed (corrected) could be released back into pastoral service. Priests located in clerical prisons were not “dangerous criminals”, but rather offenders. The house of correction in Mírov had its own rules: instructions for the dean of Mohelnice (with the duty of visitation), for the chaplain of Mírov (the superior of the house of correction in Mírov), service staff and for the incarcerated priests, of course. These instructions represented very well thought-out regulations. Based on these, we can also picture the functioning of this institution, and outline the fates of the incarcerated priests (depending upon the preserved archival sources).

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60303 - Theology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Kościół i Prawo

ISSN

0208-7928

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

6(19)

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

209-225

Kód UT WoS článku

000406480600014

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—