„Let us make man after our image, as our likeness“: Origen, Marius Victorinus and Augustine on Gen 1:26f.

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F21%3A73609290" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/21:73609290 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333189176" target="_blank" >https://obd.upol.cz/id_publ/333189176</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

„Let us make man after our image, as our likeness“: Origen, Marius Victorinus and Augustine on Gen 1:26f.

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper shows a close resemblance between Origen’s interpretations of Gen 1:26f and the first exegesis of this biblical lines as provided by Marius Victorinus in Adversus Arium IA. Augustine’s reflections seem rather different from Origen but come near to Victorinus’ second exegesis, delivered in Adversus Arium IB. In terms of doctrine, Victorinus thus seems to create a connecting link between Origen and Augustine. Victorinus sees the entire Trinity implied in the Son as the consubstantial image of the Father, which returns to the Father in the Holy Spirit. Therefore, he can affirm that the human being is the image of the Son. Augustine, on the other hand, denies the creation of the human being in the image of the Son alone. He shares Victorinus’ idea of the perichoresis of the three divine persons represented in the substantial acts of the human mind. Nevertheless Augustine does not emphasise their mutual implication as far as Victorinus did. Hence Augustine was not ready to admit the creation in the image of the entire Trinity to be the same as the creation in the image of the Son alone.

Název v anglickém jazyce

„Let us make man after our image, as our likeness“: Origen, Marius Victorinus and Augustine on Gen 1:26f.

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper shows a close resemblance between Origen’s interpretations of Gen 1:26f and the first exegesis of this biblical lines as provided by Marius Victorinus in Adversus Arium IA. Augustine’s reflections seem rather different from Origen but come near to Victorinus’ second exegesis, delivered in Adversus Arium IB. In terms of doctrine, Victorinus thus seems to create a connecting link between Origen and Augustine. Victorinus sees the entire Trinity implied in the Son as the consubstantial image of the Father, which returns to the Father in the Holy Spirit. Therefore, he can affirm that the human being is the image of the Son. Augustine, on the other hand, denies the creation of the human being in the image of the Son alone. He shares Victorinus’ idea of the perichoresis of the three divine persons represented in the substantial acts of the human mind. Nevertheless Augustine does not emphasise their mutual implication as far as Victorinus did. Hence Augustine was not ready to admit the creation in the image of the entire Trinity to be the same as the creation in the image of the Son alone.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60303 - Theology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Imago Dei. Forscher aus dem Osten und Westen Europas an den Quellen des gemeinsamen Glaubens

ISBN

978-3-7022-3881-0

Počet stran výsledku

27

Strana od-do

144-170

Počet stran knihy

460

Název nakladatele

Tyrolia Verlag

Místo vydání

Innsbruck

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—