The abbreviated overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) and the abbreviated overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS): Psychometric properties and evaluation of the zcech versions
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F21%3A73610118" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/21:73610118 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10337/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10337/htm</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910337" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijerph181910337</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The abbreviated overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) and the abbreviated overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS): Psychometric properties and evaluation of the zcech versions
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x(2)(4) = 38.28; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x(2)(4) = 36.54; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The abbreviated overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) and the abbreviated overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS): Psychometric properties and evaluation of the zcech versions
Popis výsledku anglicky
Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x(2)(4) = 38.28; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x(2)(4) = 36.54; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30304 - Public and environmental health
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA19-19526S" target="_blank" >GA19-19526S: Biologické a psychologické aspekty spirituálního prožívání a jejich souvislost se zdravím</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ISSN
1661-7827
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
18
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
19
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000707466100001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85116058425