Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The abbreviated overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) and the abbreviated overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS): Psychometric properties and evaluation of the zcech versions

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F21%3A73610118" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/21:73610118 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10337/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10337/htm</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910337" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijerph181910337</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The abbreviated overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) and the abbreviated overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS): Psychometric properties and evaluation of the zcech versions

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x(2)(4) = 38.28; p &lt; 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x(2)(4) = 36.54; p &lt; 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach&apos;s alpha = 0.95, McDonald&apos;s omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach&apos;s alpha = 0.95, McDonald&apos;s omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The abbreviated overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) and the abbreviated overall depression severity and impairment scale (ODSIS): Psychometric properties and evaluation of the zcech versions

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x(2)(4) = 38.28; p &lt; 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x(2)(4) = 36.54; p &lt; 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach&apos;s alpha = 0.95, McDonald&apos;s omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach&apos;s alpha = 0.95, McDonald&apos;s omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30304 - Public and environmental health

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA19-19526S" target="_blank" >GA19-19526S: Biologické a psychologické aspekty spirituálního prožívání a jejich souvislost se zdravím</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

  • ISSN

    1661-7827

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    18

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    19

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CH - Švýcarská konfederace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000707466100001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85116058425