Martin Luther, Sergei Nikolaevich Bulgakov and Pavel Alexandrovich Florensky: an unexpected convergence regarding the concept of the “new theology”
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F22%3A73615356" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/22:73615356 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://periodicos.pucpr.br/caminhosdedialogo/article/view/29103" target="_blank" >https://periodicos.pucpr.br/caminhosdedialogo/article/view/29103</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/cd.a10n17p273-289" target="_blank" >10.7213/cd.a10n17p273-289</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Martin Luther, Sergei Nikolaevich Bulgakov and Pavel Alexandrovich Florensky: an unexpected convergence regarding the concept of the “new theology”
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Luther, on the one hand, and Bulgakov and Florensky on the other, are theologians who at first glance show numerous differences. They belong to different historical periods and different geographical and linguistic areas, to different Christian denominations and to different schools of theology. From another point of view, however, these three figures show a series of convergences regarding one of the main aims of their intellectual activity: the elaboration of a “new theology” capable of generating a better understanding and transmission of the living and life-giving truth of Christian revelation. Adopting an epistemological perspective as the basis of an analysis of their theologies, the present article seeks to highlight an unexpected agreement between the epistemological choices that the three theologians make on their way to the creation of a new theological model. The study invites the reader to consider that, as in the case of the two Russian theologians, one of the problems for the interpretation and reception of Luther’s theology lies in his epistemological particularity. This fact is relevant to the Catholic-Lutheran dialogue.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Martin Luther, Sergei Nikolaevich Bulgakov and Pavel Alexandrovich Florensky: an unexpected convergence regarding the concept of the “new theology”
Popis výsledku anglicky
Luther, on the one hand, and Bulgakov and Florensky on the other, are theologians who at first glance show numerous differences. They belong to different historical periods and different geographical and linguistic areas, to different Christian denominations and to different schools of theology. From another point of view, however, these three figures show a series of convergences regarding one of the main aims of their intellectual activity: the elaboration of a “new theology” capable of generating a better understanding and transmission of the living and life-giving truth of Christian revelation. Adopting an epistemological perspective as the basis of an analysis of their theologies, the present article seeks to highlight an unexpected agreement between the epistemological choices that the three theologians make on their way to the creation of a new theological model. The study invites the reader to consider that, as in the case of the two Russian theologians, one of the problems for the interpretation and reception of Luther’s theology lies in his epistemological particularity. This fact is relevant to the Catholic-Lutheran dialogue.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60303 - Theology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Caminhos de Diálogo. Revista Brasileira de Diálogo Ecumênico e Inter-religioso
ISSN
2595-8208
e-ISSN
2357-965X
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
17
Stát vydavatele periodika
BR - Brazilská federativní republika
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
273-289
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—