Hereditary Sin? Augustine and Origen

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15260%2F24%3A73627804" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15260/24:73627804 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hereditary Sin? Augustine and Origen

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Augustine’s construction of hereditary sin as referable guilt which is transmitted by libidinous procreation and which in itself, without any contribution of individual human beings, merits eternal damnation, was systematically formulated for the first time in his first anti-Pelagian writing De peccatorum meritis (411/12). In my paper, Augustine’s ideas as expressed in this writing and elsewhere, are compared with Origen whose “Commentary on Romans” seems to have been used in Augustine’s construction of hereditary sin. However, there are important differences between both authors. What is transmitted in the human race, according to Origen, is not sin as referable guilt but the mortal body born from libidinous procreation and affected by sin. As Augustine left Origen’s idea of the soul, which committed sin before its incarnation, he is unable to explain how the misery of sin, transmitted by the body, can affect the soul. What is more, his conviction that all people are affected by inherited sin as referable guilt from their very birth casts doubt upon God’s righteousness.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hereditary Sin? Augustine and Origen

Popis výsledku anglicky

Augustine’s construction of hereditary sin as referable guilt which is transmitted by libidinous procreation and which in itself, without any contribution of individual human beings, merits eternal damnation, was systematically formulated for the first time in his first anti-Pelagian writing De peccatorum meritis (411/12). In my paper, Augustine’s ideas as expressed in this writing and elsewhere, are compared with Origen whose “Commentary on Romans” seems to have been used in Augustine’s construction of hereditary sin. However, there are important differences between both authors. What is transmitted in the human race, according to Origen, is not sin as referable guilt but the mortal body born from libidinous procreation and affected by sin. As Augustine left Origen’s idea of the soul, which committed sin before its incarnation, he is unable to explain how the misery of sin, transmitted by the body, can affect the soul. What is more, his conviction that all people are affected by inherited sin as referable guilt from their very birth casts doubt upon God’s righteousness.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60303 - Theology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

„Inherited sin?“ Erbsünde? Forscher aus dem Osten und Westen Europas an den Quellen des gemeinsamen Glaubens, vyd. Theresia Hainthaler et alii

ISBN

978-3-7022-4167-4

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

269-285

Počet stran knihy

544

Název nakladatele

Tyrolia Verlag

Místo vydání

Innsbruck

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—