Mimikry vs. podobnost: které podobnosti mezi hnízdními parazity a jejich hostiteli jsou mimetické a které nikoli?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F05%3A00002999" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/05:00002999 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Mimicry is one of the most conspicuous and puzzling phenomena in nature. The best known examples come from insects and brood parasitic birds. Unfortunately, the term "mimicry" is used indiscriminately and inconsistently in the brood parasitic literaturedespite the obvious fact that similarities of eggs, nestlings and adults of brood parasites to their hosts could result from many different processes (phylogenetic constraint, predation, intraspecific arms-races, vocal imitation, exploitation of pre-existing preferences etc.). In this note I wish to plead for a more careful use of the term. I review various processes leading to a similarity between propagules (both eggs and nestlings) of brood parasites and their hosts and stress that 1) mimetic and non-mimetic similarities should be differentiated, 2) a mere similarity of host and parasite propagules provides no evidence for mimicry, 3) mimicry is more usefully understood as a (co-evolutionary) process rather than an appearance and 4)

Název v anglickém jazyce

Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Mimicry is one of the most conspicuous and puzzling phenomena in nature. The best known examples come from insects and brood parasitic birds. Unfortunately, the term "mimicry" is used indiscriminately and inconsistently in the brood parasitic literaturedespite the obvious fact that similarities of eggs, nestlings and adults of brood parasites to their hosts could result from many different processes (phylogenetic constraint, predation, intraspecific arms-races, vocal imitation, exploitation of pre-existing preferences etc.). In this note I wish to plead for a more careful use of the term. I review various processes leading to a similarity between propagules (both eggs and nestlings) of brood parasites and their hosts and stress that 1) mimetic and non-mimetic similarities should be differentiated, 2) a mere similarity of host and parasite propagules provides no evidence for mimicry, 3) mimicry is more usefully understood as a (co-evolutionary) process rather than an appearance and 4)

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EG - Zoologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP206%2F03%2FD234" target="_blank" >GP206/03/D234: Konflikt rodič-potomek v kontextu koevoluce mezi hnízdním parazitem a jeho hostitelem</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2005

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

ISSN

0024-4066

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

84

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

69-78

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—