Rovná práva parazitickým mláďatům

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F07%3A00004626" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/07:00004626 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Equal rights for chick brood parasites

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Evolutionary interactions between brood parasites (e.g., cuckoos) and their hosts (e.g., small songbirds) became an important model for the study of coevolution, recognition and other subjects central to evolutionary biology. I argue that both primary literature and textbooks provide an unequal picture of brood parasite?host relationships: they make an impression that hosts can defend against parasite only at the egg stage but not at the nestling stage. However, the general impression that chick discrimination is either very rare or even non-existent does not follow from available data ? it is studies of chick-related host adaptations which are rare. Using quantitative data on publication and citation rates of egg vs. chick studies I show that there isa strong inequality in favour of egg studies and against chick studies in respect to both research effort (number of studies, number of model host species, studies sample sizes) and citation rates. This bias is apparent in both observati

Název v anglickém jazyce

Equal rights for chick brood parasites

Popis výsledku anglicky

Evolutionary interactions between brood parasites (e.g., cuckoos) and their hosts (e.g., small songbirds) became an important model for the study of coevolution, recognition and other subjects central to evolutionary biology. I argue that both primary literature and textbooks provide an unequal picture of brood parasite?host relationships: they make an impression that hosts can defend against parasite only at the egg stage but not at the nestling stage. However, the general impression that chick discrimination is either very rare or even non-existent does not follow from available data ? it is studies of chick-related host adaptations which are rare. Using quantitative data on publication and citation rates of egg vs. chick studies I show that there isa strong inequality in favour of egg studies and against chick studies in respect to both research effort (number of studies, number of model host species, studies sample sizes) and citation rates. This bias is apparent in both observati

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

EG - Zoologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP206%2F03%2FD234" target="_blank" >GP206/03/D234: Konflikt rodič-potomek v kontextu koevoluce mezi hnízdním parazitem a jeho hostitelem</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2007

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annales Zoologici Fennici

ISSN

0003-455X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

44

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

FI - Finská republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

1-7

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—