Nanoelectrospray versus electrospray in chiral analysis by the kinetic method

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F09%3A00010408" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/09:00010408 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Nanoelectrospray versus electrospray in chiral analysis by the kinetic method

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Electrospray ionization generates trimeric diastereoisomeric clusters as the first important step in chiral analysis by mass spectrometry using the Cooks' kinetic method. Cu2+ and L-tryptophan were used as a central metal and as a chiral reference ligand, respectively. The comparison of electrospray and nanoelectrospray showed that although the electrospray system was generally more robust, the application of nanoelectrospray was essential for performing successful analysis in some cases, especially forreal samples. Basically, no significant differences between the ion sources were observed for model samples of analytes (isoleucine, ephedrine, phenylalanine) without interfering matrix. On the other hand, model samples containing sodium chloride and abuffer containing a real sample (drug formulation Mucoseptonex E in which D-ephedrine is the active substance) could not be analyzed using ESI, whereas nano-ESI gave satisfactory results. An explanation is based on the differences of ioni

Název v anglickém jazyce

Nanoelectrospray versus electrospray in chiral analysis by the kinetic method

Popis výsledku anglicky

Electrospray ionization generates trimeric diastereoisomeric clusters as the first important step in chiral analysis by mass spectrometry using the Cooks' kinetic method. Cu2+ and L-tryptophan were used as a central metal and as a chiral reference ligand, respectively. The comparison of electrospray and nanoelectrospray showed that although the electrospray system was generally more robust, the application of nanoelectrospray was essential for performing successful analysis in some cases, especially forreal samples. Basically, no significant differences between the ion sources were observed for model samples of analytes (isoleucine, ephedrine, phenylalanine) without interfering matrix. On the other hand, model samples containing sodium chloride and abuffer containing a real sample (drug formulation Mucoseptonex E in which D-ephedrine is the active substance) could not be analyzed using ESI, whereas nano-ESI gave satisfactory results. An explanation is based on the differences of ioni

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

CB - Analytická chemie, separace

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA203%2F07%2F0765" target="_blank" >GA203/07/0765: Analýza izomerů hmotnostní spektrometrií a kinetickou metodou</a><br>

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2009

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications

ISSN

0010-0765

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

74

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—