SMALL BOWEL IMAGING - STILL A RADIOLOGIC APPROACH?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F10%3A10211953" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/10:10211953 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61989592:15110/10:10211953

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

SMALL BOWEL IMAGING - STILL A RADIOLOGIC APPROACH?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in small bowel imaging using a variety of radiologic or endoscopic techniques. This article gives an overview and comparison of old and new techniques used in small bowel imaging. Methods. Systematic scan of Pubmed,Medline, Ovid, Elsevier search engines was used.. Additional information was found through the bibliographical review of relevant articles. Conclusions. In a comparison of endoscopic and radiologic approaches, radiologic techniquesare less invasive for patients, they take less time to investigate and allow imaging the entire small bowel. Some do not involve radiation exposure (US, MR). Endoscopic methods are more expensive, more invasive, need longer examination time and technicalspecial skills but without radiation exposure. The greatest advantage of some endoscopic methods is the possibility of mucosal biopsy in one step with diagnostic examination (EGD, push enteroscopy, intraoperative enteroscopy, ileocolonos

Název v anglickém jazyce

SMALL BOWEL IMAGING - STILL A RADIOLOGIC APPROACH?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in small bowel imaging using a variety of radiologic or endoscopic techniques. This article gives an overview and comparison of old and new techniques used in small bowel imaging. Methods. Systematic scan of Pubmed,Medline, Ovid, Elsevier search engines was used.. Additional information was found through the bibliographical review of relevant articles. Conclusions. In a comparison of endoscopic and radiologic approaches, radiologic techniquesare less invasive for patients, they take less time to investigate and allow imaging the entire small bowel. Some do not involve radiation exposure (US, MR). Endoscopic methods are more expensive, more invasive, need longer examination time and technicalspecial skills but without radiation exposure. The greatest advantage of some endoscopic methods is the possibility of mucosal biopsy in one step with diagnostic examination (EGD, push enteroscopy, intraoperative enteroscopy, ileocolonos

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FP - Ostatní lékařské obory

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Biomedical Papers

ISSN

1213-8118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

154

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—