Fuzzified AHP in evaluation of R&D outputs - a case from Palacky University in Olomouc

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F13%3A33146479" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/13:33146479 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.vspj.cz/soubory/download/id/2259" target="_blank" >https://www.vspj.cz/soubory/download/id/2259</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Fuzzified AHP in evaluation of R&D outputs - a case from Palacky University in Olomouc

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this paper we present a method developed at the Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc for the assessment of scientific quality of books (for the purposes of funds distribution among departments). The method is based on the fuzzified AHP used to determine fuzzy weights of predefined categories of publishers prior to the evaluation process. The weights reflect the reputation of the publishers from the respective category. The following evaluation process then combines expert assessment (peer review) with the less subjective criterion of publishers reputation. In the first stage of the two-stage evaluation process, each book is evaluated by a fuzzy number which corresponds with the reputation of the publisher and is interpreted as an interval of possible evaluations - scores (the support) with a most typical score (default evaluation - the only element in the kernel of the fuzzy number). In the second stage, the default evaluation can be altered during the peer review proce

Název v anglickém jazyce

Fuzzified AHP in evaluation of R&D outputs - a case from Palacky University in Olomouc

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this paper we present a method developed at the Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc for the assessment of scientific quality of books (for the purposes of funds distribution among departments). The method is based on the fuzzified AHP used to determine fuzzy weights of predefined categories of publishers prior to the evaluation process. The weights reflect the reputation of the publishers from the respective category. The following evaluation process then combines expert assessment (peer review) with the less subjective criterion of publishers reputation. In the first stage of the two-stage evaluation process, each book is evaluated by a fuzzy number which corresponds with the reputation of the publisher and is interpreted as an interval of possible evaluations - scores (the support) with a most typical score (default evaluation - the only element in the kernel of the fuzzy number). In the second stage, the default evaluation can be altered during the peer review proce

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

BA - Obecná matematika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Economics 2013 - Part II.

ISBN

978-80-87035-76-4

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

"856?861"

Název nakladatele

Vysoká škola polytechnická Jihlava

Místo vydání

JIhlava

Místo konání akce

Jihlava

Datum konání akce

11. 9. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—