AHP based decision support tool for the evaluation of works of art - Registry of Artistic Performances
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F13%3A33146505" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/13:33146505 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/158161305/Proceedings-of-the-FORS40-Workshop" target="_blank" >http://www.scribd.com/doc/158161305/Proceedings-of-the-FORS40-Workshop</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
AHP based decision support tool for the evaluation of works of art - Registry of Artistic Performances
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper provides a description of the mathematical model for the evaluation of creative work outcomes of Czech Art Colleges. 27 categories of works of art are defined based on 3 criteria, that are partially dependent - relevance/significance, extent and institutional and media reception. The 27 categories are then ranked using the pair wise comparison method. Subsequently Saaty's AHP is used to determine a score for each category. The proposed evaluation methodology combines evaluation based on objective criteria with peer review and suggests a possible way of solving the problem of arts evaluation for funding purposes. The concept of weak consistency is used in the model as a minimum requirement on consistency of the expertly defined matrix of preference intensities. For pair wise comparison matrices with ordered categories, the fulfillment of weak consistency can be checked during the data input phase. This way the weak consistency of pair wise comparison matrices can be achieved e
Název v anglickém jazyce
AHP based decision support tool for the evaluation of works of art - Registry of Artistic Performances
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper provides a description of the mathematical model for the evaluation of creative work outcomes of Czech Art Colleges. 27 categories of works of art are defined based on 3 criteria, that are partially dependent - relevance/significance, extent and institutional and media reception. The 27 categories are then ranked using the pair wise comparison method. Subsequently Saaty's AHP is used to determine a score for each category. The proposed evaluation methodology combines evaluation based on objective criteria with peer review and suggests a possible way of solving the problem of arts evaluation for funding purposes. The concept of weak consistency is used in the model as a minimum requirement on consistency of the expertly defined matrix of preference intensities. For pair wise comparison matrices with ordered categories, the fulfillment of weak consistency can be checked during the data input phase. This way the weak consistency of pair wise comparison matrices can be achieved e
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
BA - Obecná matematika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the Finnish Oprerations Research Society 40th Anniversary workshop - FORS40
ISBN
978-952-265-436-6
ISSN
2243-3376
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
44-47
Název nakladatele
LUT Scientific and Expertise Publications
Místo vydání
Lappeenranta
Místo konání akce
Lappeenranta, Finland
Datum konání akce
20. 8. 2013
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—